Deathlike2
Regular
Murakami said:I'm tired to argue with you, our points of view are opposite: i'm not interested in forums' talk (that i've already read), speculation or something like that...i'm searching for a proof, an official statement, because my brain tells me that if nVidia admits that NV40 video processor is "borked" there were no problems admitting the same thing for NV45.
The difference between us is that you're losing your patience insulting me about my "blind ignorance", me not.
I'll do myself a favor: i'll test this infamous WMV9 acceleration feature on my own...the only real problem is that one of the 2 WMP10 patches that enable DXVA acceleration is not removable and i don't want to format my O.S. for that matter.
Um.. even though the FX was a POS hardware for its generation.. NVidia admitted this years later when the 6800 series fixed the bad PS2 performance problem inherent in the FX architecture.
For the 6800 series.. it is still a staple selling point for the mid-high range.. and getting ANY sort of official response from NVidia will not happen anytime soon. No company will admit to bad products unless that product is well on its way out. This is no different. Official statements HAVE come out... but not from NVidia to the public directly, but only to the reviewers such as Anandtech who are relaying this info. You make it sound like it is speculation.. when really, it has come from the horse's mouth.. under someone else's voice (the reviewer in this case).
I'll do myself a favor: i'll test this infamous WMV9 acceleration feature on my own...the only real problem is that one of the 2 WMP10 patches that enable DXVA acceleration is not removable and i don't want to format my O.S. for that matter.
Lots of stuff done on your system is not exactly "easily" removable such as DX9 (though there is a tool to solve that, but this concept has always applied for many patches/software MS has provided)... I don't understand what is stopping you from testing it yourself given that you seemingly are very much interested in the results of the test. You really do need to test for yourself to know the truth.
Last edited by a moderator: