Kojima on next gen Hardware

"Are the new console platforms fulfilling what it’s makers promise?

I actually haven’t started developing on the new consoles yet. My impression is, for PS3 Sony is aiming for a very high level. I’m not sure if everyone can live up to that high standard that Sony is expecting. So if everyone is expected to meet that high level, I am not sure that every creator, every publisher will be able to meet these high expectations. For Xbox 360, it’s a little bit more down to earth, more realistic so people maybe can join easily to start creating on the 360. Speaking about Revolution, there are still a lot of secrets and I don’t know everything but from what I heard like you could connect your portables or you could play old games, I get the impression that the developers could create games on less budget or create titles that are not super high expensive in cost. If you allow me to express the three hardware platforms in a funny example, PS3 would be like a dinner that you only have once a year or twice a year on your anniversary etc.


Xbox 360 will still be a special dinner so you might go there two or three times a month on the weekend or something. Revolution is the kind of great dinner that you have everyday at your home. What I want to emphasize is that all three are dinners meaning that they have a salad, they have a soup and maybe have a dessert but they are a little differently, maybe other dinners have two salads or two appetizers or maybe extra coffee on top of that. The point is that they are all individualistic dinners. So if they are all dinners, like a steak dinner, the choice is up to the users and the game designers at the same time.

If the game creators and the users want to have a great steak for their anniversary, they go maybe to PS3. But if they want great dinner, great steak with their family, a little bit more casual during the weekends, they might select Xbox 360. Or why not have a great steak at your house everyday, they might choose Revolution. So my impression of the battle between the consoles is, it’s not about what kind of dinner it is. It’s more about how much the dinner will be. Will it be worth the cost of being served? Or where can I have this dinner - number of restaurants, is it near my house or do I have to take a cab or train or bus? I think the battle amongst the next-gen platforms lies in that area
. "

http://ps2.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=8293T
:?:
 
Then the Revolution sounds more like some kind of high-speed Gamecube (remenber triforce).
The main concern will be lower cost of development (and more developments), gameplay improvement and immediate availability of games (legacy), while the others will be more expensive Art/Design/FX.
 
Then the Revolution sounds more like some kind of high-speed Gamecube (remenber triforce).

How did you get that from a dinner analogy?

Triforce was just a GC with more ram BTW, nothing high speed about it and nothing to do with Revolution.
 
So where PS3 is a 6 course at the Paris Hilton, and XB360 is three courses at a local restaurant, Revolution is a microwaved TV dinner?

If I'm still paying the same prices for my meals, I'd rather have the Paris Hilton thank you very much!

I think this analogy is gonna bite Nintendo in the butt when word gets out!
 
Shifty Geezer said:
If I'm still paying the same prices for my meals, I'd rather have the Paris Hilton thank you very much!

I think this analogy is gonna bite Nintendo in the butt when word gets out!

I think the analogy was that it'll be cheaper to make games for the Rev over 360 and PS3. So by that regard, you'll get a couple of fantastic looking PS3 games a year, and the Rev good looking ones every day :p

Pretty dumb analogy
 
PARANOiA said:
Shifty Geezer said:
If I'm still paying the same prices for my meals, I'd rather have the Paris Hilton thank you very much!

I think this analogy is gonna bite Nintendo in the butt when word gets out!

I think the analogy was that it'll be cheaper to make games for the Rev over 360 and PS3. So by that regard, you'll get a couple of fantastic looking PS3 games a year, and the Rev good looking ones every day :p

Pretty dumb analogy

Shame that if Nintendo keeps it up like the last 10 years, that will sound more like "one great looking game every 3 months". ;)
 
PARANOiA said:
I think the analogy was that it'll be cheaper to make games for the Rev over 360 and PS3. So by that regard, you'll get a couple of fantastic looking PS3 games a year, and the Rev good looking ones every day :p
Yes, it was a comparison for devs. But with 100 devs turning out 2/3 'expensive' games a year on PS3, and 100 devs turning out 300 'home-meals' a year on Rev, that's a choice of 2-300 'expensive' games or 30,000 'microwave meals' :?

Kojima's statement needs to be locked away forever and wiped from umanity's collective memory. No good will ever come of it.

Maybe Nintendo will have fire-fighting strategies to counter any negative PR from this, getting endorsements from Delia Smith and Jamie Oliver for development on Revolution being 'cheap, easy, yet tasty'? ;)
 
Back
Top