Tesselator
Newcomer
pso said:Jack Tretton: "It is gameplay."
Hehehe, Jack Tretton is "perfectly mistaken!"
pso said:Jack Tretton: "It is gameplay."
Man, just accept it, it's all CG.Nerve-Damage said:Why do I feel all this news about PS3 Killzone being prerendered (even if it is or not) seems like an elaborate hoax!?!
Two guys with less than 30 posts between them (with no NDA) suddenly bring up Killzone being prerendered…I smell bullsh**.
The video seems like a hack job of E3 digital video and possible LightWave3D Killzone assets. It looks like someone overlaid E3 Killzone footage over supposed LightWave3D Killzone assets.
Whoever this Jeremy character is…it seems the Killzone still shots were all of suddenly taken down of the site!?!
I smell BS!!
pso said:Misquote? I don't know about that. You could download the video from IGN and fast forward to 3:40 mark and he basically answered the question he was giving about Killzone directly.
Edit: Anyways, it doesn't really matter now. At the time when I first saw the live interview, I found his answer funny.
Eagle-Vision said:Man, just accept it, it's all CG.
Nerve-Damage said:I have no problem in believing that Killzone was prerender or not…….
I have a problem when I smell BS!!
So I guess the video of Xbox 360 being hacked by a PSP should be believed too!?!
weaksauce said:No you see that's the problem, you don't see that they talked about I-8 just before that, and Tretton goes on talking about it, but not the interviewer. They show killzone on the tv, but Tretton doesn't see that. He's talking about I-8, why else would he mention Ted Price?
BlueTsunami said:The Killzone Demo is on another level though. You've got a Demo that is said to be gameplay or target renders (so many different answers for the Demo) and was shown at a major Exposition to millions of people
That Xbox 360 video (being hacked) is just some random video someone made on the net.
When you say PS/PS2 has great games... You'll know you have been brainwashed!!!
Nerve-Damage said:The still shots had them (all of suddenly there gone) explain that!
Tesselator said:
Ah, so this is a quote but taken out of context?
That would make more sense as a reasonable explanation as to why
something like that would have been said during an interview.
centerofadmiration said:If Konami thought the video was faked I don't think they would have used that trailer in the MGS4 video.
centerofadmiration said:Just look at the dudes signature.
Sorry but I've been gaming for 17 years and I know great games when I play them. The PSOne and PS2 have had more great games then any two systems before them. Any 5 systems combined in fact.
Your just full of it. I'll have a good laugh when the next Killzone footage is shown and it looks stellar.
Tesselator said:
There are a number of plausible explanations that could explain this.
The one most prevalent in my own mind would be the scenario in
which Jeremy has read this thread and decided not to rock the boat
or encourage any possible repercussions. Keeping your customers
happy is more important than being in the right for being in the wrong
with the display of any particular work.
weaksauce said:No you see that's the problem, you don't see that they talked about I-8 just before that, and Tretton goes on talking about it, but not the interviewer. They show killzone on the tv, but Tretton doesn't see that. He's talking about I-8, why else would he mention Ted Price?
pso said:After listening to the interview, here is his full answer:
"Interviewer: So it is gameplay, all that stuff is all gameplay?
Jack Tretton: It is gameplay. I mean beyond great gameplay, I think we have the opportunity to tap into worldwide development resource. Cause when you mention something like Killzone, that's of our? sister company over at Europe."
Here's an article from IGN stating the same thing:
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/618/618430p4.html
"Despite the above details, however, the biggest controversy about the game has been the nature of the drop-dead gorgeous trailer that ran at Sony's E3 press conference. Is it real-time or is it rendered? The official answer from SCEA Vice President Jack Tretton is that it was real and actual gameplay, but SCEE Executive VP of Development Phil Harrison has stated that some of the trailers during the presentation were rendered using in-game assets. We're leaning towards Harrison's answer right now until we can play the game for ourselves -- but either way, the trailer rocked."
I guess some people interpret his answer in a different way that IGN and I listened to.
Edit: What Jack Tretton said about the Killzone demo is no different than what MS stated about the Xbox with "Toy Story" graphics. Lies, PR spin, whatever you want to call it, all the same IMO.
Nerve-Damage said:BULLSH**!!
The shots had so many discrepancies; even a blind man could see them.
I’m surprised no one else in this thread caught them!?!
Moving footage is harder to break down and judge, while (hoax) still-shots are easily recognizable.