Well, I don't think a hardware accelerated browser would make much difference in modern desktops or mid-to-high end laptops.
Here are my remarks on a system where hardware acceleration should actually make a difference.
My system Acer Ferrari One:
Athlon Neo L310 (2*Brisbane @ 1.2Ghz)
2*2GB Dual-Channel DDR2 @ 240MHz (480MHz DDR)
Radeon HD3200 IGP (RV610 -> 40SPs, 4 TMUs, 4 ROPs) @ 380MHz
You could say this is the approx. performance you would get from a system with a C-50 APU, or something between C-50 and E-350.
This particular Athlon Neo has the Cool'n'Quiet function disabled, but I programmed RMClock to underclock and undervolt it gradually down to 800MHz\0.7V if the CPU usage is below 65%.
I've been using Chrome for work (google docs + professional mail account) and the latest Firefox 3 for slacking off (trolling around B3D, usual feeds, personal gmail+gchat, etc).
Canvas performance:
Firefox 3: 9fps
Chrome: 13 fps
IE9 Software: 13fps
IE9 Hardware: ~65FPS
Overclocking the IGP to 508MHz won't give me any more performance. both GPU-Z and CPU-Z claim it's using a 32bit connection (3.2GB/s) to memory, so I'm probably bottlenecked by memory bandwidth anyway.
(BTW, I'm not sure how this is possible?! Wasn't it supposed to use the full 2*64bit system bus?! Even if it was using only the sideport memory, that would be a 16bit bus, not 32bit.. Even weirder is that GPU-Z claims the memory is working @ 400MHz, where I know for a fact it's working @ 480MHz.. I may start a thread somewhere to figure this out)
Positive remarks:
- Canvas test much faster
- Web pages load a lot faster than Firefox 3
- Integrated pdf viewer is faster than Firefox 3
Negative remarks:
- Scrolling is sluggish in text-heavy pages (i.e. Wikipedia articles). Seems to be some kind of a bug, since sometimes it works properly (as in, comparable to Firefox 3). There's a "scroll smoothing" option enabled in the advanced options, but I feel no smoothness at all.
- It unexpectedly drains CPU power a LOT more than Firefox 3. If I have a couple of "heavy" pages opened (engadget + news sties with flash ads + igoogle), it'll stick the CPU at 100% usage all the time. The "feeling" is that it's rendering all the tabs at the same time, as if they were all visible in separate windows.
- Youtube 720p videos have choppy playback (in Firefox 3 they're flawless), even though they load faster.
- Keyboard input gets weird sometimes (some keys intermitently lack response and yes, I'm using a wired keyboard).
I have the subnotebook connected to an external 1080p monitor through D-SUB, so I'm using both a 1080p screen and the integrated 1366*768 LCD. Some bugs might be related to the dual-monitor setup, I don't know.
In my case, you could say it's the browser to use when opening heavy pages (lots of pics and animations), but it's currently the worse option for power saving in the CPU domain, and that's where I thought it would shine.