D
I know right. This is just soooo disrespectful to the engineers at Intel and it makes me pretty angry I admit. This is how HUB gets their clicks, they want you to feel strong emotions, instead of reviewing the hardware in a neutral and objective manner. They always use words like terrible, fail, unuseable, shitty etc in their wording.I feel like death looking at that thumbnail.
Imagine being a PHD computer scientist putting your day's work into an implementation for years and you see the word "fail" next to it on YouTube for some minor visual artefacting. Clearly, there are better ways to describe visual artefacts that require less hyperbole and "shitting on".
Here is the title for the FSR 1.0 video: AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution Analysis, Should Nvidia be Worried?
well, whenever I see a recommended video of them I am going to click on "Don't recommend this channel". I did the same with the JayzTwoCents channel back in the day when he accused nVidia of using cheap capacitors that were causing issues with their RTX 3000 GPUs when they were launched, that allegedly caused those GPUs to freeze and so on, just because another person, an actually knowledgeable guy theorized about that -he was wrong, but that guy at least created that theory himself and he usually knows what he's talking about even if he might be wrong.
Imagine Dr Cutress who spent 3 years on doing Phd in chemistry but now he makes money on YouTube testing computers.I feel like death looking at that thumbnail.
Imagine being a PHD computer scientist putting your day's work into an implementation for years and you see the word "fail" next to it on YouTube for some minor visual artefacting. Clearly, there are better ways to describe visual artefacts that require less hyperbole and "shitting on".
It doesn't even need hardware DP4a support, just Shader Model 6.4. DP4a accelerates it though. Meaning it should work on Navi21 (RX5700 etc) too (only Navi without DP4a I think?)List of games that support Intel XeSS (list updated september 20th):
Intel details XeSS tech: Arc A770 GPU benched, 20+ games support XeSS
Intel details its XeSS technology, benchmarking its new Arc A770 with XeSS enabled: 2x performance improvement, 20+ games will support XeSS upscaling tech.www.tweaktown.com
As long as your GPU has dp4a support, then it is fully compatible to use XeSS on any game. This is XeSS running on a GTX 1630:
afaik, RX 5700 doesn't have dp4a support, yeah. As for what you mention, I've seen videos using XeSS natively on a GTX 1060. The overall speed is better than native although it doesn't perform like on dp4a compatible or native Intel gpus.It doesn't even need hardware DP4a support, just Shader Model 6.4. DP4a accelerates it though. Meaning it should work on Navi21 (RX5700 etc) too (only Navi without DP4a I think?)