Imagination IP for PC

ngkmh

Newcomer
Its been a while since that last Imagination thread so I'll kick one off....

Saw this posted in an investor's site (IMG had AGM yesterday):

Some very good demo's yesterday including the 8 pipe series 5 PC card which was there to demonstrate series 5 technology. Kristof claimed this tech was 50% faster than anything the competition as currently capable of....

Any comments Kristof?
 
ngkmh said:
Its been a while since that last Imagination thread so I'll kick one off....

Saw this posted in an investor's site (IMG had AGM yesterday):

Some very good demo's yesterday including the 8 pipe series 5 PC card which was there to demonstrate series 5 technology. Kristof claimed this tech was 50% faster than anything the competition as currently capable of....

Any comments Kristof?

would you mind giving me a link ? thx
 
50% faster than the competition for the next 3 months? At which time it will be roughly as fast? And by the time it could be on the street it will be 50% slower?

I hate to pee in anyone's oatmeal, but is there any particular reason I shouldn't think of it that way?


Edit: I should mention that the roadmappery I've seen referenced elsewhere seems to suggest 2H 2007 for a desktop part hitting the streets, and this informed my (grossly unfair? Love to have someone with the cred to do so come in and say that) post above.
 
geo said:
50% faster than the competition for the next 3 months? At which time it will be roughly as fast? And by the time it could be on the street it will be 50% slower?

I hate to pee in anyone's oatmeal, but is there any particular reason I shouldn't think of it that way?


what I'm interested in is the Spec of "Transistor counts" and "Die Size" ?

G80 500M
R600 600M
High-End PVR5 will be ???
 
chavvdarrr said:
or 50% faster than 8-pipe cards from other vendors?

Oh, damn, I hadn't even considered that one! :cry:

Tho possibly that's not terrible, assuming it scales within acceptable current process limits.
 
geo said:
Oh, damn, I hadn't even considered that one! :cry:

Tho possibly that's not terrible, assuming it scales within acceptable current process limits.
I disagree. That would be terrible. 50% more oomph against competing 8-pipers could put the validity of the whole approach into question.

Thankfully (?) we're missing the clockspeed from the equation. If a very slow-running early sample did that, things are looking good.
At similiar clocks and bandwidths it isn't unreasonable to expect at least 150% more bang against an IMR, IMO.
 
Keep in mind that when the little birdeis were saying "Series 5 is about to come out if it's ever going to come out at all," all of those little birdies were saying "it's eight pipes." That was a few years ago.

Something to ponder.
 
The Baron said:
Keep in mind that when the little birdeis were saying "Series 5 is about to come out if it's ever going to come out at all," all of those little birdies were saying "it's eight pipes." That was a few years ago.

Something to ponder.

Depends what you mean with "pipes" exactly. There are also crack pipes (sorry for the pun :p).
 
While the eight pipeline configuration at this point in their roadmap could be early work on an integrated PC and/or laptop solution, it might be a development prototype running on the PC representing either SGX530 or Thalia-L, their embedded cores for high-performance cellphones and for car navigation systems respectively.
 
What is a "pipeline" nowadays and how exactly do you folks define it? Even moreso in a unified shader core.

SGX530 was claimed to have an effective fill-rate of 1.2GPixels/s. I don't see it having more than 2 TMUs and that's already quite high for a core that's slated for high end PDA/mobile devices.

If there truly was demonstrated anything for the PC, I have severe doubts that it had anything to do with either SGX530 or Thalia-L. If it was something with say 8 TMUs for instance then it should be quite a bit apart from anything SGX or Thalia-whatever.
 
zeckensack said:
I disagree. That would be terrible. 50% more oomph against competing 8-pipers could put the validity of the whole approach into question.

Thankfully (?) we're missing the clockspeed from the equation. If a very slow-running early sample did that, things are looking good.
At similiar clocks and bandwidths it isn't unreasonable to expect at least 150% more bang against an IMR, IMO.

NV43 would be such an "8-piper" (again depending what anyone means with "pipe" exactly). If that should be a comparative measure then even 150% is more than just conservative IMHO. Since marketing usually works with "up to" figures there could be quite a few case scenarios where higher ballparks could be yielded. Since NV43 cannot combine for instance MSAA+ float HDR, imagine what a combination of even 2xSSAA + float HDR would result to.
 
geo said:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33318

Well, Inq doesn't have any problems putting two and two together, and getting 22.

Fuad said in a recent newsblurb that after licensing MBX, Intel might also license SGX. I simply mailed him and linked him to the licensing announcement from the 17th of May 2005 for Eurasia/SGX with Intel.

He assumes again too much obviously, since afaik G965 hasn't anything to do with IMG.
 
Nobody in this business believes in coincidence much.

Even less so after Monday. :LOL:

People see both Intel and ImgTec seriously stirring after a long desktop graphics somnulence, and minds will go there, appropriately or not.
 
If then I don't see anything prior to GMA "4000" or whatever they'll call it.
 
good to see a thread started quoting me!

Yup nice in-house PC demo. IMG have yet to tie up a partner for Athena its desktop graphics chip however they do have a project for MUSE intended for UMPC/Laptop configurations.
 
trumphsiao said:
what I'm interested in is the Spec of "Transistor counts" and "Die Size" ?

G80 500M
R600 600M
High-End PVR5 will be ???

Ok, I'll bite here. Less than 300 Mio.
 
roninja said:
good to see a thread started quoting me!

Yup nice in-house PC demo. IMG have yet to tie up a partner for Athena its desktop graphics chip however they do have a project for MUSE intended for UMPC/Laptop configurations.

Hmmm any ducks in that demo? ;)

If IMG hasn't yet a partner for Athena, it looks as grey for a PC desktop sollution as it always did. Unless of course Intel truly is interested in standalone graphics, which I frankly will only believe if I see it officially announced.
 
Back
Top