So, let me get this strait. If your running a Meth-lab in your basement and are selling it to kids and your neighbor found out; he told you to get rid of the Lab immediatly or he'll call the police. So, you refuse and he calls... For the next 12 years, a negotiator is talking to the Meth dealer on the phone - to no avail. Next thing you know, SWAT blows off your door and comes charging into your house. You retreat to the bathroom, unbeknownst to them, with your 6 month old kid and slam the door shut. As SWAT approaches you start randomly shooting out the door. SWAT breaches the door and in the CQB an unidentified shot (from either party, as it's irrelevent) hit the child. As soon as the dealer is dead, SWAT rushes in and saves the kids life.
So, your telling me it's SWATs (or society at large's) fault that the kid was injured? If anything SWAT should be commended for removing the treat to the community, and freeing that child to live a life outside the realm of the methhead - a life that the child had no control over, a life that was unable to defend itself, a life that society had to protect.
I* happen to think the fault is as follow:
(a) Meth-dealer's fault for having a Meth-Lab
(b) Meth-dealer's fault for using the kid as a shield
(c) Meth-dealer's fault for even raising a kid in that enviroment