Image Quality and Framebuffer Speculations for WIP/alpha/beta/E3 games *Read the first post*

Discussion in 'Console Technology' started by Farid, Nov 7, 2008.

  1. assurdum

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think could free something the use of 4xmsaa or less, in the RAM use imho. On the 360 at least.
     
  2. jaidek

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. kagemaru

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Ohio
    Doh, should have noticed the aspect ratio and such. Sorry. :oops:

    IIRC (and lately I've been wrong so who knows) they only save 7MB since the frame buffer where AA is resolved (correct?) resides in the edram. Though you're correct that they would save on the geometry overhead from tiling.
     
  4. qb2k5

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just played the ps3 demo and like Burnout it runs at a solid 60fps.
     
  5. (((interference)))

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    70
    7MB is still significant when you only have 512MB to work with. I mean the PS3 OS only uses 10-20 MB more than the 360's and you still have developers complaining about the lack of memory on PS3.

    And when you're building an open world game, you'd think you'd want all the RAM you can get (same for wasted geometry processing due to tiling)
     
  6. Gitaroo

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    62
  7. Afrikan

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    3
    anyone know if Madden 2012 demo's resolution for both the 360 and PS3?

    I believe both have been 720p since the beginning of this gen...but you never know what a new year brings.

    I have tweeted, posted, PM'd the devs about MLAA for the PS3 version this year...for a good year and a half. But never got a response back, even though they respond to other questions.

    There have been about 3-4 EA titles this year that use MLAA....as well as a couple of more that will later this year... Battlefield 3..and I'm guessing Need For Speed The Run. I would hope EA Tiburon would take it into consideration. And maybe they have...I just never got a response.
     
  8. Scott_Arm

    Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    15,134
    Likes Received:
    7,680
    I thought most of the EA Sports titles were 4x MSAA anyway? Could be wrong.
     
  9. kagemaru

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Ohio
    Yeah you have a point, Crytek did make note of gaining 14MB for Crysis 2 (PS3) when they lowered the resolution. Didn't know the PS3 OS was only 10-20MB more, John Carmack made it seem like it was a larger gap than that in his recent QuakeCon keynote.

    IMO in regards to the overhead for tiling, if they aren't CPU bound and can spare the resources to handle the extra geometry load, then it may not be worth moving away from what they know. I get the impression most devs still prefer MSAA, unless we're talking about a deferred renderer, so why not use it if you can?

    Out of curiosity, what EA games have used MLAA? I know Alice, but can't think of anything else.

    As for your question, I don't recall aliasing ever being a real issue with the series, so maybe they just don't bother.
     
  10. KKRT

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,040
    Likes Received:
    0
    NFS: Shift 2 and Dragon Age 2.
     
  11. kagemaru

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Ohio
    Dur, thanks, for some reason I was thinking those came out last year. :oops:
     
  12. assurdum

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Never understood why the ps3 OS require so much more RAM than 360...:???: & considering how awful was the size to the beginning, I can't yet to understand what problem have the engineers who works in this department...
     
    #2772 assurdum, Aug 11, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 11, 2011
  13. Afrikan

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    3
    as well as Portal 2. Although it wasn't developed by an EA Studio...it was published by EA. :grin:
     
  14. kagemaru

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Ohio
    MS has had years and years of experience creating OS, so it's kind of understandable.

    It also functions differently than the 360's OS. Unless things have changed in the last year or two, the gap is raised when features are added to the game, such as KB or custom soundtrack support. Almost like the OS works on a modular level. Though they may have optimized and absorbed some of the memory cost into the base OS footprint for certain features (such as the cost of friends list support for example). I haven't paid attention to OS consumption in a couple years so I'm not sure if they did this or not.

    Also, don't forget that the 360's dashboard is 480p IIRC, while the ps3's is full HD. I know this would matter most in the dashboard of both consoles, but maybe it also effects the footprint of the OS during gameplay too.

    Not really the topic for this, but I'm sure we can carry on in one of the many OS related topics already made. :smile:

    Oh yeah, remembered the other two games mentioned, but totally forgot about Portal 2 entirely.
     
  15. Mastperf

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    The 360 dashboard is 720p.
     
  16. Morkins

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
  17. Yashamaru

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    You need to copy and paste the link in a new tab :wink:
     
  18. kagemaru

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Ohio
    Thanks, but now I wonder why the XMB looks sharper. I always read that the 360 dash was 480p upscaled. Maybe it's 720p NXE while the XMB is 1080p?
     
  19. damienw

    Regular

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    LA
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...