I confirmed 960x704 QAA for R3. Sorry, I meant there was nothing new to say otherwise. I misread his question.
from neogaf
(not sure if direct-feeds or not)
http://www.abload.de/img/quicktimeplayer2011-07ilvc.png
http://www.abload.de/img/quicktimeplayer2011-0709ab.png
http://www.abload.de/img/quicktimeplayer2011-07azs6.png
http://www.abload.de/img/quicktimeplayer2011-07ebeu.png
http://www.abload.de/img/quicktimeplayer2011-07ibnv.png
not good enough for Al to do his magic, I guess?Those are screenshots taken from the latest gameplay video released by 343i. They're heavily compressed, as per YouTube standards.
the AA is definitively pretty interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYfNBCHYHFE&hd=1
Very hard to say imho, too much frenetic & short to have a clear opinion. By the way look a step back compared halo reach how someone has said previously (well not same developers). but I'm not talking of native framebuffer which count relatively for an impressive graphic (at least judging even resistance 3 where I'm quite impressed afterall so subhd / 'disgraceful' render) I admit, I was more impressed by the capture than from that video: there are a lot of things which appears too much outdated to me (even for a 'remade'). Will see when it coming out.
not good enough for Al to do his magic, I guess?
Anyway it looks very clean from those shots... fxaa?