Sigfried1977
Legend
Which is just about everywhere with UE3
Image Quality and Framebuffer Speculations for WIP/alpha/beta/E3 games *Read the first post*
- Thread starter Farid
- Start date
Which is just about everywhere with UE3
Last edited by a moderator:
And Nebula's shots from the new trailer if anybody wants to try
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1504857&postcount=951
Quality is a bit less than stellar but he claims to have the best version of the vid available yet.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1504857&postcount=951
Quality is a bit less than stellar but he claims to have the best version of the vid available yet.
Heres link to video I used (mp4) and other formats if needed for other scene perspectives.
http://www.gamersyde.com/news_crysis_2_trailer-10320_en.html
http://www.gamershell.com/news_108320.html
http://www.gamefront.com/crysis-2-be-the-weapon-trailer/
http://www.gamersyde.com/news_crysis_2_trailer-10320_en.html
http://www.gamershell.com/news_108320.html
http://www.gamefront.com/crysis-2-be-the-weapon-trailer/
http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/7...2030121569.jpg
This one looks downsampled from 900p, possibly higher.
i nerini del buio
Newcomer
What about Dead Space 2? Demo is up on XBL, 1.23GB
corduroygt
Banned
Wasn't the first game 1200x720 and 16-bit shadow maps on the PS3 version vs. 1280x720 with 24-bit shadow maps on 360?
i nerini del buio
Newcomer
it is not as much aliased as dead space 1, though
but it doesn't seem to use msaa... uhm, maybe a custom software solution?
but it doesn't seem to use msaa... uhm, maybe a custom software solution?
TDU2 screenshots (PS3, 360) http://www.gamesaktuell.de/Test-Dri...im-Grafikvergleich-807742/galerie/1479413/#tp
djskribbles
Legend
is that MLAA?
Rather QAA.
360: It's pretty hard to make out exactly with the heavy compression, but it looks to be 720p 2xAA.
PS3: Might be using QAA. Then again, it might even be a custom AA solution. Texture details are blurred though edges are pretty clean. The compression is pretty abysmal really, so I'd wait for better shots to be certain of anything.
PS3 does seem to have a tad higher AF.
PS3: Might be using QAA. Then again, it might even be a custom AA solution. Texture details are blurred though edges are pretty clean. The compression is pretty abysmal really, so I'd wait for better shots to be certain of anything.
PS3 does seem to have a tad higher AF.
First Skyrim direct feed screenshot
http://media1.gameinformer.com/imag...0_V_3A005F00_Skyrim_5F00_Media/Markarth01.jpg
Looks like a custom anty-aliasing solution for me.
http://media1.gameinformer.com/imag...0_V_3A005F00_Skyrim_5F00_Media/Markarth01.jpg
Looks like a custom anty-aliasing solution for me.
Looks supersampled tbh.
Are You sure? There's still quite many aliasing left.
(((interference)))
Veteran
Yea, thats what I said as well, if its supersampled it's strange they would leave some aliasing - unless they're deliberately trying to deceive the pixel counters
Supersampling applies to any factor above 1.0 of the output resolution. It could be 1281 x 721 and I'd still call it supersampling, as ridiculous as it seems. The clues are in what aliasing doesn't appear. 1.5x1.5 SS won't solve all edge cases, and neither will 2x2.
