IBM Out of Chip Manufacturing Business and General Execution Thread

Discussion in 'Graphics and Semiconductor Industry' started by UniversalTruth, Feb 8, 2014.

  1. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/45110.wss

    There's IBM's own press release
     
  2. 3dilettante

    Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    8,579
    Likes Received:
    4,799
    Location:
    Well within 3d
    IBM really didn't want the fabs anymore, but such a very motivated seller means there's a very good chance that it's not something worth paying money for.

    It doesn't seem like GF was interested in the fabs and their heavy costs as much as the engineers and IP. The amount IBM paid is likely heavily based on the burden the manufacturing operations represent, on top of IBM contracting manufacturing from the division it has separated from.

    Those more familiar with the fab industry would probably have more insight, but it reminds me of the GF spin-off where ATIC paid AMD for a struggling silicon manufacturing arm.
    Hector Ruiz wrote a book that discussed about how he suckered Abu Dhabi into bidding high for GF, perhaps they learned a lesson about buying factories that can't seem to sell enough product, and how few other bidders there likely would be.
    Whether there still isn't a catch is a different question.

    Granted, GF as an organization has a far more intimate understanding of the business than a sovereign wealth fund would have had back then.
     
  3. Putas

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    355
    Not at all, GF have to manufacture them for 10 years.
     
  4. Erinyes

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    276
    Yea..according to reports..the division lost $700m last year. Even if they paid GF $1.5 billion, or rather $1.3 billion if we exclude the $200 million working capital, that will be lost in 2 years if they continue at the present rate. Do GF really think they can turn it around that fast?
     
  5. lanek

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Well, i dont think GF will run the fabs as IBM was doing ( so by product their own Power processors only ).

    Basically, for the number of chips produced ( and sold ), the cost of the Fabs was way too high. Its why today, you nearly have only Samsung and Intel who are product their chips in their own Fabs now.
     
  6. Silent_Buddha

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    19,423
    Likes Received:
    10,316
    IIRC, IBM didn't only produce their own chips. They also made chips for others similar to TSMC.

    Regards,
    SB
     
  7. lanek

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Some, this was extremely limited... nothing like GF or TSMC .... their clients base and profit are, well, the money they do with that speak for itself.
     
  8. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Last time I remember IBM doing chips for anyone else was NVIDIA in the GF FX (or was it GF6?) times
     
  9. Erinyes

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    276
    But its not as if GF's fabs are running full and they really need the extra capacity do they? If IBM's fabs are in an even worse position, where are they going to magically find the customers to fill capacity?

    True but also note that Samsung probably produces more chips for Apple than for themselves. And even Intel is doing a bit of foundry work for the likes of Altera AFAIK.

    Yep..GF FX is the only one I remember IBM doing. And they switched back to TSMC pretty soon.
     
  10. Putas

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    355
    It should not be so hard to find somebody in need of 22nm process capable of making chips as complex as Power 8.
    AFAIK IBM manufactured 130nm Geforce 6 line + NV36.
     
  11. Erinyes

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    276
    Well if it isn't that hard..surely IBM would have found them by now? Just to clarify, I'm just very curious about this whole deal. Obviously there must be some solid reasons for GF to go for it, I'm just trying to figure out what they are.
     
  12. I.S.T.

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,174
    Likes Received:
    389
    They manufactured CELL and the Xenon for a while.
     
  13. TheAlSpark

    TheAlSpark Moderator
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    22,146
    Likes Received:
    8,533
    Location:
    ಠ_ಠ
    & Nintendo*. I suppose all their orders would be quite a bit less lately.

    *maybe not particularly lucrative considering die sizes. :wink4:
     
  14. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Those three were more or less "their own chips" though, even if MS was part of Xenon development, Nintendo part of their CPUs development and Sony & Toshiba part of Cell
     
  15. willardjuice

    willardjuice super willyjuice
    Moderator Veteran Alpha

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,386
    Likes Received:
    299
    Location:
    NY
    They make 32nm cisco chips too. IBM does a lot of low volume (but highly custom) niche stuff in addition to their power chips. It's important to remember fishkill in general is a small fab that has to cover a broad range of nodes (22nm-1x0nm, eventually 14nm finfet). IBM was never going to match tsmc, gf, etc. They targeted different markets (highly specialized vs high volume). It's just the highly specialized fab market pays out far less than it used to. :sad:
     
  16. UniversalTruth

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,747
    Likes Received:
    22
    BRiT likes this.
  17. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242
    IBM unveils world’s first 7nm chip
    With a silicon-germanium channel and EUV lithography, IBM crosses the 10nm barrier.

    http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/07/ibm-unveils-industrys-first-7nm-chip-moving-beyond-silicon/
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...