fulcizombie said:First of all you are lying when you say
that your 9800 run it fine with maximum everything
Maximum detail settings and 1024x768, yes it handled it fine, by fine I mean smoothly. It did bog down in some parts but was still playable and for the most part the game was smooth. Comparable in framerate to Halo on the xbox.
And no there's nothing wrong with my pc,it's just the fact that you are lying.
I didn't say "run fine",i said "run at a constant 60 fps".
The link I posted proved that the game averages well over 60fps with max settings at 1024x768 and probably higher (since the 6600GT already does).
IMO,farcry on the pc absolutely crushes things like COD2.Judging by the small video Predator will look much better than COD2 when it's released.
I personally think the two are about even however COD2 does represent X360 quality graphics so like I said, if you think Farcry its better, then you think its up there with the best X360 games.
For a "cheap port",predator looks amasing(and i am judging it by videos not screenshots).
I doubt the devs would describe there efforts as a "cheap port".
I could care less how old the pc farcry,the original Unreal was released in 1998 and was much better looking than the first ps2 FPS(timesplitters).
The age of the game is at least as important as the graphics themselves. Its not better comparing the graphics of Quake 4 to UT2003 and concluding that id is capable of better grahics than Epic. You should be comparing two games which are released in the same time period.