Guden Oden said:
london-boy said:
After a group closely linked to AQ claimed responsibility
You know, anyone can claim responsibility for anything, and A-Q doesn't REALLY exist as a group either. It's not as if it's any real, tangible entity with a board room where usama and his officers have meetings you know... It's at best a loosely connected network of badguys and evildoers.
Whether or not they are AQ in name only, and not reporting to higher ups in Bin Laden's organization, I think we can safety predict that the perpetrators where:
a) Almost assured to be Muslim
b) Probably Arab (opr Moroccan) or Pakistani, but more likely to be Arab
c) get help from AQ-linked organizations, in planning, if not in resources.
London is one of the most secured cities I know. Camera's are everywhere. After 30 years of IRA attacks, British people are very aware of unattended packages. London trains stop when someone notifies about unattended bags. Yet, the attack was still pulled off, showing how easy public transportation is as a target, condensing individuals into neat little sardine packages to be bombed,, and there is not much defense against it.
Hopefully, the numerous cameras have video of the perpetrators planting the devices, and they will use this to round up the cells.
It's ridiculous to even suggest Britain should change its policies based on these attacks., especially in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is an international operation, there at the request of the Afghan democratically elected government, and the Arab terrorists who are demanding troops out of Afghanistan aren't even citizens of that country. What right do they have to speak for them. To give in to such blackmail would continue to set a dangerous precedent.
And not having troops in Afghanistan and Iraq doesn't even remove you from the target list, as France (one of the Axis of Peace countries opposed to Iraq War) learned last year when Muslim terrorists looking to blackmail for monetary gain put bombs on their rail lines.