Nope , real question is what is the REAL fault rate ? ... You really believe that % 3-5 rate bs ?..
Lol, I am talking about the xbox360 Elite version fault rate (is there any report yet?)!
Nope , real question is what is the REAL fault rate ? ... You really believe that % 3-5 rate bs ?..
its actually a feature, Elite is "Bug Compatible" with previous versionElite includes the 3 rings of death too...
Someone want to explain what the "3 rings of death" are?
http://img9.imagepile.net/img9/17588vandammebsod.gif <---Gif
I think that's way too low as you can see by several polls in various forums (made myself one here where you can easily add one more "0" to that figure.
It is nothing to do with statistics, obviously without access to the customer database and a random phone poll nobody but microsoft knows the statistical failure rate. BUT, everyone can see the *extraordinary* number of reports of *sequential* failures of the xbox 360 reported on *every single xbox forum* by *multiple* users and only a fool or someone with blinkers on would refuse to acknowledge that this console clearly has a big reliability problem (compared to the Wii and the PS3 and DS and PSP and even a bog standard dell PC). And the reliability issue is being contained only be generous and expensive return policies and warranty extensions offered by microsoft which doesn't seem to mind losing 100s of millions per year for as long as it takes, in order to gain market share.Right, and there is no sample bias error in such a poll?
People who don't know a thing about stastics but trying to use them are only slightly less dangerous than people who do.
It is nothing to do with statistics, obviously without access to the customer database and a random phone poll nobody but microsoft knows the statistical failure rate. BUT, everyone can see the *extraordinary* number of reports of *sequential* failures of the xbox 360 reported on *every single xbox forum* by *multiple* users and only a fool or someone with blinkers on would refuse to acknowledge that this console clearly has a big reliability problem (compared to the Wii and the PS3 and DS and PSP and even a bog standard dell PC). And the reliability issue is being contained only be generous and expensive return policies and warranty extensions offered by microsoft which doesn't seem to mind losing 100s of millions per year for as long as it takes, in order to gain market share.
sony engineers thought big for ps3. Very beautiful engineering inside the box
Sound_Card said:What's wrong is basing info from forum polls and threads. With that said, I don't think anyone here in the right mind would argue and say that the 360 is a flawless build. Things however can be blown out of proportions on forums considering that it's one of the first places to go when someone is having trouble.
What's wrong is basing info from forum polls and threads. With that said, I don't think anyone here in the right mind would argue and say that the 360 is a flawless build. Things however can be blown out of proportions on forums considering that it's one of the first places to go when someone is having trouble.
Obviously, MS know's thier is a failure rate issue(3%-5% is still alot as someone already pointed out) and hence why they have extended the warrenty to two years.
did you guys know that its power brick that actually causes the problem not the console...
i can't be bothered to read if someone might have posted above, but... nothing wrong with posting again.
What's wrong is basing info from forum polls and threads. With that said, I don't think anyone here in the right mind would argue and say that the 360 is a flawless build. Things however can be blown out of proportions on forums considering that it's one of the first places to go when someone is having trouble.
Obviously, MS know's thier is a failure rate issue(3%-5% is still alot as someone already pointed out) and hence why they have extended the warrenty to two years.
No I don't think we knew that, probably because it quite likely isn't true...
http://www.konsolifin.net/bbs/showthread.php?t=34661
I have posted this survey from a finnish gaming site before. (All the necessary info is on the first post of that thread) Right now it shows 145 boxes broken out of 397 which translates to 37% and while it's definately not a scientific research, the sample size is imo big enough that this 3-5% talk can be thrown into a trash can. I think even Microsoft has admitted that the real number is bigger than 3-5% which they originally stated it to be.
Again, in and of themselves internet polls are no use. But as a comparative measure, they are fine. The same rules apply to posts about busted XB360's as busted Wii's. busted PSPs, busted PS2s, etc. It's the same demographic posting/voting, with the same average trends in use. There's no reason to think posts or votes or anecdotes of XB360 being dodgy will be less reliable as the same info on PS3 and Wii. If on a board of 1000 users, 30 say their XB360 has died 4x, 3 say their PS3 has died, and none say their Wii has died, taking in account relative sales of consoles and uptake on the board, you'd see a reliable, though not numerically accurate, indicator that XB360 has a higher failure rate.If you think you rely on an informal internet survey from internet gaming sites you are highly mistaken.
Do you think that such polls even attempt to eliminate variables that can affect the validility of their results? What the likelihood that the forum polls account for things like motivation, honesty and the difference between people who responded to the poll and the people who didn't respond?
If you think you can rely on an informal internet survey from internet gaming sites for any type of reliable evidence, you are highly mistaken.