Interesting read: http://ncroal.talk.newsweek.com/default.asp?item=283363
And I found this part rather revealing...
Anyways, pretty good read.
Now that Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 are both on the market, publishers, developers, analysts and gamers are trying to figure out one thing: which of these two powerhouses is going to come out on top? (We'll address the Wii separately.) Microsoft has an early lead thanks to its yearlong head start. But is that enough to be the winner when all is said and done? Maybe not.
And I found this part rather revealing...
Moore's job, however, was made easier by the fact that for the greater part of this year, PlayStation chief Ken Kutaragi hadn't finalized the business terms for independent publishers on the PS3. And without that, he was reluctant to greenlight any expenditures on Western third-party exclusives. In previous generations, Kutaragi's slowness hadn't been much of a problem because the first two PlayStations launched in Japan 8-12 months ahead of North America, leaving plenty of time to nail things down with Western publishers. But with the PS3 launching in North America just a week after Japan--and a year after a fiercely competitive Microsoft--Kutaragi's tardiness became a major issue.
We've learned that Take-Two and Rockstar Games were interested in continuing their longtime relationship with Sony, in which they premiered their Grand Theft Auto games on PlayStation platforms exclusively for 6-12 months before bringing them to other systems. Also, Ubisoft was interested in making Assassin's Creed, due in stores next spring, exclusive to the PS3. But neither company's top executives--all extremely important figures in the games industry--could get an answer from Kutaragi. PlayStation's Japanese headquarters was effectively radio silent, and without Kutaragi's signoff, the normally independent American and European branches had no authority to reach agreements on the exclusives they believed could be valuable to the PS3 cause.
Anyways, pretty good read.