As per his quote, it's lower on the power curve. Which is exactly why it uses less power. All the PC parts are being pushed much harder with higher clocks. The amount of voltage is cubic with respect to clockspeed. Which is why even a drop of 100Mhz-300Mhz can result in massive power savings.
I think the point @Silent_Buddha is getting at using the steam deck, for example, comparatively, it is just as powerful as OG Xbox One but draws less than 25W of power. Obviously, they are both on different nodes and several years apart in terms of technology. Still impressive for a small bit of kit.
The pc gpus are pushed way past their efficiency window and they have better cpus in general. If you buy an intel nuc with a 45 watt cpu and cram an undervolted 3060 into it, there’s a pc in a similar wattage range with similar performance.
Super excited for this. I wonder if they fixed the latency issue.
When Minecraft RTX came out on PC, I had a vanilla RTX2060. It was lower than 30fps without DLSS on at 1080p IIRC. I now have an RTX2070 Super. I just booted it up again, and bear in mind when I had the 2060 RT was only in the beta fork, and it still run pretty poorly without upscaling. The thing is, in the beta, the options were nVidia branded I think. So "Upscaling" was DLSS. Now, it's upscaling. Does it work the same on AMD cards? Anyway I get about 35fps at 1440p with the lowest setting (8) for RT render chunks. It basically doubles with upscaling. I'll be interested to see how the Series versions perform, and what the upscaling looks like.
lammmmeeee
I've not played Minecraft for a good while and never on console.
I think it's a multiplayer aspect.. or the lighting may change game mechanics making it not feasible in MP.
