Gameplay clip: http://uk.gamespot.com/shows/on-the-spot/?event=on_the_spot20110922
After the 29 minute mark.
After the 29 minute mark.
*Confirmed* Original Crysis Bound for *PS360
- Thread starter fellix
- Start date
I don't think that's the case at all. Take a look at the presentation on the site that originally hosted that video. Its shows significant differences in CE3's lighting even between the PC's lowest setting and the console settings.
GIven that this TOD demonstration is a demonstration of the engine rather than the console game it stands to reason that they would turn everythign to max.
Even if that were the case I wasn't citing GI as the only potential difference from the console implementation here. It was just an example. Others would be the complexity of SSAO - or even SSDO, shadow complexity, colour grading, tone mapping, tesselated water, POM quality etc... all of these are things that can be turned up in the engine that won't necessarily be tunred up to maximum in the console build.
YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMIdsED4JYw
@pjbliverpool: I was actually just speaking from my experience with the editor and Crysis 2 - I'll take a look at that presentation.
Direct link
http://ll.lo.video.gamespot.com/d4/gsc/2011/09/169_ots_archive_092211_1200.mp4
Its lacking anizo, but rest is still in. LOD is quite aggressive, but in C1 and Warhead was too.
Texture streaming is quite aggressive too, it can be noticed when he's zooming at those speed limit signs - zoomed they look ugly, up close they have normal texture.
http://ll.lo.video.gamespot.com/d4/gsc/2011/09/169_ots_archive_092211_1200.mp4
Its lacking anizo, but rest is still in. LOD is quite aggressive, but in C1 and Warhead was too.
Texture streaming is quite aggressive too, it can be noticed when he's zooming at those speed limit signs - zoomed they look ugly, up close they have normal texture.
Just seen some vids and pics but looks insane. Prolly on overall not as teach heavy as PC version but assimilation is like Crysis VH + TODs. I see a lot of resemblance to the TOD schemes I created ( 
) with perhaps higher bloom/HDR strength. Does console version also use FXAA?
Anyways impressive and just imagine would CE2 been what CE3 is. Multiplatform games would had looked insane from 2006/2007 and onwards for all platforms.
) with perhaps higher bloom/HDR strength. Does console version also use FXAA?Anyways impressive and just imagine would CE2 been what CE3 is. Multiplatform games would had looked insane from 2006/2007 and onwards for all platforms.
Good to have you back Neb
dragonelite
Veteran
From the paper we know that they are using their own solution 2x Quincunx SSAA
http://iryoku.com/aacourse/downloads/13-Anti-Aliasing-Methods-in-CryENGINE-3.pptx
L. Scofield
Veteran
Nice to see the jeep lights are actual lights and not just sprites like in PC Crysis xD
The new vid isn't impressive to me, but it's just the low vid quality. Makes everything look drab and flat. Well, the day stuff. Night looks good.
Notice he (Crytek guy in gamespot vid) says everything is intact expect one exception, they removed "ascension", he says based on player feedback.
Which google tells me was the VTOL level, which I do remember being horrible. One of many places in the game I couldn't progress due to horrible bugs.
Notice he (Crytek guy in gamespot vid) says everything is intact expect one exception, they removed "ascension", he says based on player feedback.
Which google tells me was the VTOL level, which I do remember being horrible. One of many places in the game I couldn't progress due to horrible bugs.
Dark's been taking some very high PC shots at Neogaf and they're not looking so good
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31221410&postcount=957
I suppose I can do the same, I own the game and I can max it.
Posting screens on the internet is such a lost cause imo.
And then here's another, console at the bottom I think
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31222975&postcount=1000
Basically looks like the console holds up much better than I thought, if not some people are claiming it looks better.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31221410&postcount=957
I suppose I can do the same, I own the game and I can max it.
Posting screens on the internet is such a lost cause imo.
And then here's another, console at the bottom I think
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31222975&postcount=1000
Basically looks like the console holds up much better than I thought, if not some people are claiming it looks better.
View distance isn't the same, I don't think - not even close. You can see that in the video.
This image casts doubt on the validity of the released console screenshots:
The console shot actually does look quite a bit better there. The extra trees aren't really a draw distance thing though, they are literally just extra trees which have either already been knocked down in the PC version or just weren't there in the first place. I guess theirs been a bit of tweaking of the foliage for visual effect.
Actually someones trying to take the piss with that shot. All those trees and foliage are present in the PC version at stock:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Was it a case of blowing the trees up to give a false representation? That sounds like the internet....
I can't see any difference in foliage/grass distance compared to the shot I posted. Where specifically are you looking?
