No I worded it wrong, both will lose in their first year and despite being 100$ more expensive, I think One won't be loosing much less money.
AFAIK, Xbox One is actually selling at a profit.
No I worded it wrong, both will lose in their first year and despite being 100$ more expensive, I think One won't be loosing much less money.
Once again, they are launch games, more than likely they've been rushed and not tailored to the X1's architecture. Drawing any conclusions from these results is not a good idea.
They certainly should have matched the base graphical power of PS4 and then added Kinect on top.
Is 500$ realistic enough?Can you please take this more seriously? Matching the PS4 and adding Kinect and keeping a realistic price, all at the same time, has never been an option.
AFAIK, Xbox One is actually selling at a profit.
They have said that their not selling at a loss, and a I believe they said minor profit but cant remember if the profit part is actually the case or not.If that is the case then they could decrease the selling price and make the whole deal a lot sweeter.
I don't think they're selling at a profit. Break even is probably the best case, even then if that were the case they would probably have taken a hit on cost and tabled a system that was cost effective.
If that is the case then they could decrease the selling price and make the whole deal a lot sweeter.
I don't think they're selling at a profit. Break even is probably the best case, even then if that were the case they would probably have taken a hit on cost and tabled a system that was cost effective.
The problem with your approach lies within the very nature of Kinect 2.What MS should focus on a lot more is actually not the graphics, but Kinect 2. The entire hardware had to go through these trade-offs in order to have the budget for that periphery, it's long overdue for the thing to earn its keep.
Can you please take this more seriously? Matching the PS4 and adding Kinect and keeping a realistic price, all at the same time, has never been an option.
Is 500$ realistic enough?
I think it's still pretty much on the edge, but far more realistic than $600-650.
As I said in my previous post replying to Laa Yosh, that could be wrong because one of the most alluring things about the Xbox One for me was the combination of traditional capable technology and family oriented features. :smile:I absolutely agree. But focus on what exaclty? Will people be swayed with "Xbox launch"? They had it in their smartphones for some years now. I would love to see what they can do with Kinect 2 in next gen games but I seriously think only hand gestures will limit pretty much any kind of complex game majority of us here want to play.
Now if you are into Kinect sports I guess more of the same (albeit more responsive and precise) is something we will see alot of.
PS4 + a cracked kinect surely wouldn't cost over 500 USD.
Just read in the newspaper today that the NSA tapped Google's cables at their point of entry, so they could watch all Google's internal storage as well as traffic to the outside world. Google is pissed as they were never asked, and they are now replacing cables and implementing encryption also internally.
Can you please take this more seriously? Matching the PS4 and adding Kinect and keeping a realistic price, all at the same time, has never been an option.
The PS4 is selling at a loss.
Sony said they need to sell a game or two to break even.