Blu-ray will not matter...

Joe DeFuria said:
Actually, they both have valid points and counter-points. (Once you cut through the rashness and bullshit, of course...)

No they (well Powerkeg) kinda doesn't. Now Joe can you answer this question (and I'm only asking you because I know I will get a straight answer)?

Why should we wait for consumer friendly priced HVD media for movies (which wouldn't happen until 2008 at the earliest) while Blu-ray can display movies great in HD at 1080p now and at a reasonable cost?
 
mckmas8808 said:
Why should we wait for consumer friendly priced HVD media for movies (which wouldn't happen until 2008 at the earliest) while Blu-ray can display movies great in HD at 1080p now and at a reasonable cost?

I'm not saying anyone should wait for anything. (At the same time, owners of HDTV sets are not "owed" anything from anyone with respect to high-def optical media.) I bought my HDTVs with two things in mind:

1) Receive High-def broadcasts from my cable provider.
2) Be able to view DVDs using progressive scan technology.

If and when HD media / movies become a reality, that will be a bonus. (Though only for one of my HDTVs...my other one lacks HDMI so high-def optical media won't likely make any difference).

I'm saying that there is plenty of reason to not expect a quick adoption of hi-def media in general. (Blur-ray, HD-DVD...whatever.) I'm also saying the PK did have valid counter points to DC's points. (For example, even if 71% of new TVs sold in 2009 are high-def...I don't see how that translates into a large installed based of HDTV sets to really push high-def movies for this generation.)

I'm all for tech advancement. Push blu-ray out now...push HD-DVD out...and in 3 years push out another format for all I care. The market will ultimately decide....
 
mckmas8808 said:
No they (well Powerkeg) kinda doesn't. Now Joe can you answer this question (and I'm only asking you because I know I will get a straight answer)?

Why should we wait for consumer friendly priced HVD media for movies (which wouldn't happen until 2008 at the earliest) while Blu-ray can display movies great in HD at 1080p now and at a reasonable cost?
Are movies being encoded at 1080p? I thought 720p was standard, but I could be wrong.

.Sis
 
BTOA said:
All I have to say is that HDTV owners want HD material playing on their HDTV sets.

Since Sony will be offering consumers both a world of HD content, gaming and movies, with PS3. I think HDTV owners will bite on both ends, IMO.

Besides, who's going to complain about HD content being more easily available? They have to be either a non-HDTV owner or against HD to be complaining about the HD content being available in the form of games, movies, and TV broadcasting material. ;)
Yeah, HDTV owners want HD channels on their TV. But DVDs look pretty good on HD sets today. I watched the Titanic HD trailer that comes with the Xbox 360 and to be honest I really didn't see a leap in difference from a regular DVD. (I'm sure a side by side comparison would be easier to detect...)

Another anecdote: my dad was watching some standard def TV, stretched, on his HD TV. He tells me, "Doesn't that look great? It's high def."

The point isn't that my dad is dumb, but that he is an average consumer and thinks Widescreen == High Definition.

So not only do you have to divide out a smaller portion of the overall market in order to arrive at the number of HD ready households, but you also have to divide out those that are willing/wanting to move to a new format.

.Sis
 
Sis said:
Yeah, HDTV owners want HD channels on their TV. But DVDs look pretty good on HD sets today. I watched the Titanic HD trailer that comes with the Xbox 360 and to be honest I really didn't see a leap in difference from a regular DVD. (I'm sure a side by side comparison would be easier to detect...)
There's a different, I blame that trailer. ;)

Sis said:
Another anecdote: my dad was watching some standard def TV, stretched, on his HD TV. He tells me, "Doesn't that look great? It's high def."

The point isn't that my dad is dumb, but that he is an average consumer and thinks Widescreen == High Definition.
To be honest, it doesn't sound like you're dad is dumb. It sounds like your dad had a bad sales rep who informed him with info. Most consumer are suckered into believing or believe that they'll get a HD picture out of a SD signal, so this isn't the first time I heard of this.

Sis said:
So not only do you have to divide out a smaller portion of the overall market in order to arrive at the number of HD ready households, but you also have to divide out those that are willing/wanting to move to a new format.
I'm not arguing about what % of HD vs SD. HDTV are dropping in price and of course SDTV are still widely available, but that will have little effect on HDTV sales. People who are willing or want to upgrade to HDTV need a reason to buy.
 
Well, consumer-friendly HVD media won't happen for much longer than that! If you look at a 20$ DVD, only 10% of that is actual material costs. Now, let's just say that for an HVD movie, that 18$ will balloon to 50$ (for the sake of argument). Then that initial 100$/pop (in 2007-2008 timeframe, according to Warner) is still about 50$ worth of HVD manufacturing, with about a buck for the case.

2$ of manufacturing (DVD, BluRay and HD-DVD, roughly), versus 50$ (HVD, roughly). Even if my numbers are wrong (which they are, just a question of how much, and in whose favor), we are talking a large order of magnitude difference in manufacturing costs. You can't just make that vanish in a year or so. It is possible that HVD (in its current incarnation) will remain out of reach of the consumer mass-media space for over a decade because of fixed costs in manufacturing not getting driven down low enough, even as space increases. It will get there eventually, but not in time to matter for HD content, maybe by 2020 HVD can be used for mass-media.

The bigger threat to something like BR/HD-DVD is digital content over the Internet. That is something that can be cheap enough to rival it, and is even more convenient. However, with MS wanting to be the toll taker using Media Center, and ISPs getting angry that customers actually use the 1-4Mbps downstream that they were told they could use... that model has a long way to go before it becomes feasible as well (in the US anyways).
 
Powderkeg said:
Yes, and it won't be remotely close to the 150 million you would need to make up just half of the market.

You don't need 150 million to makeup half the households, you need 52 million. 104 million is the number of households that can rent or buy optical media.
 
The problem with assuming everyone will want a HD movie format to go with their HDTV is that you ignore the reality that current progressive scan 480p DVD's look substantially better on an HDTV than people are accustomed to seeing on their old SDTV sets. People don't really "need" a HD movie format to enjoy the improvements their HDTV brings. Of course, HD-DVD and BR will offer even more visual improvement, but assuming that HDTV purchasers are going to be knocking down doors to get the newest media format seems a bit, well, presumptious.

Truth is, most probably won't care. Truth is, most of HDTV purchasers have only bought HDTV because the picture looks good, it is the current SOTA, salesmen tell consumers that HDTV will be the new standard, and in short people that are going to spend a chunk of money on a new TV will figure that they are wasting money to not go ahead and spend a little more to get what everyone tells them is the new standard. It isn't like they are salivating on the release of HD movie formats. Most probably aren't even aware that such a thing is in the works... most probably think DVD is HD, and for all practical purposes, for them, on their shiny new TV, it will look that way.

Putting BR in the PS3 still doesn't make for a "value" BR player. The PS3 will hardly be cheap. And standalone BR players will only be $1000 for a matter of months, if that. Hell, I bought a DVD player (a really nice one, Denon, pretty much SOTA at the time) in 1996 for $600. Within the year I could have bought an equivalent player for just a couple of hundred. I expect "value" standalone BR players to be available within a year of BR launch for $200-$300, possibly less.

Besides, people just don't seem to use consoles for movie players. The number of people who even own a PS2 or XBOX compared to people who own standalone DVD players is rather small. And out of the people who own the consoles, how many use it as a DVD movie player, let alone their primary player? Of all the people I know personally that have one of these consoles, none use it as a DVD player to routinely watch movies. Small anecdotal sampling, but it makes me think the percentage of console owners to use it for that role is significantly less than 100%. That makes for a very small portion of the total DVD player market. I can't see how the situation will be that much different for the PS3.

Again, having more features is great. I just hope they serve some purpose as far as gaming is concerned.
 
I don't know why anyone even mentions HVD, blu-ray has scaled up to 200GB in the labs which is probably comparable to what I've heard may be first gen HVDs, unless they offer 1TB right out the get go, HVDs are not going to offer much of an advantage and even still even1080p doesn't require that much room. 200GB peak is enough for the next few years.

I only hope the ps3 drive is at least 4x, then it'd truly shine even more.
 
Powderkeg said:
Are you stupid?
Did you just say the number of owners is irrelevent in determining your potential market?

Way to go to start with an insult Powderkeg.

It's the number of HOUSEHOLDs not the number of TVs that determine the market for optical media. Every household in America could have an HDTV and there's still be a 3:1 ratio of SDTV : HDTV. That ratio won't do anything to impair uptake of HD media, regardless of whether hybrid disks exist or not, although if a hybrid format wins, it will toss your argument completely in the shitter. You quote SDTV numbers, but don't even bother to check if there is a 1:1 mapping between SDTV and DVD.

Moreover, the demographics of those who buy HDTVs are exactly those that movie studios love.

So you claim. Got any proof?

Consumer Electronics Association of America said:
Arlington, Va., April 15, 2005 - The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) today announced that February 2005 unit sales to dealers of direct view and rear projection digital television (DTV) products rose 43 percent over February 2004, showing continued strength in this key consumer electronics product category. CEA stated that February sales reached 342,060 units on dollar sales of $443 million. Year-to-date unit sales are up 14 percent over the first two months of 2004 and full year 2005 sales are expected to more than double the final 2004 total of 7.3 million units. CEA also announced that total February 2005 sales of DTV products including monitors displays and integrated sets reached 498,554 units on dollar sales of $699.4 million, marking a 29 percent increase over combined sales in February 2004. "Digital television, particularly HDTV (high-definition television) remains the fastest-growing segment of the consumer electronics industry, driven by strong consumer demand for flat-panel and rear-projection HDTV products," said CEA President and CEO Gary Shapiro. "At the same time, however, the rate of growth is slower than we originally anticipated, due to a variety of factors." CEA is revising its full-year 2005 projections for DTV product sales to 15 million units from the previously announced 20 million.

So 15 million units in 2005, 7 million in 2004.

From 2003 article
Consumer Electronics Association of America said:
From product introduction to date, DTV product sales total 5,851,621 units, with a consumer dollar investment of some $10.3 billion. CEA projects 4 million units will be sold in 2003, 5.4 million in 2004, 8 million in 2005 and 10.5 million in 2006. CEA defines DTV products as integrated sets and monitors displaying active vertical scanning lines of at least 480p and, in the case of integrated sets, receiving and decoding ATSC terrestrial digital transmissions.

So prior from 2003 and prior, only about 6 million units had been sold. But 4 million were projected to be sold in 2003, leaving 2 million for 2002 and prior.

So we have: 2,4,7,15. Looks exponential to me. Based on that, there are now 28 million DTVs. According to CEA since 2003, 87% of DTV sales have been HDTV. So atleast 87% of 26 million = 22 million HDTVs at the beginning of 2006, or 1 in 5 households. More than enough high-income upper middle class households to drive the hi-def optical media market in its early adopter phase.

And even if 100% of new sets sold were HDTV, how much difference does that make? The average owner uses the same TV for 10+ years, so anyone who has bought a TV in the past year 5 years isn't likely to buy another one within the next 5.

It would make a lot of difference, since CEA projects that most people *are* upgrading their sets.

(comment about sports bars deleted). That's the best you've got? How many of your 300 million TVs are old and busted sets sitting in people's garage, or sitting in guest rooms that are never used? My family used to have about 5 TVs in the house. One of them was the living room (color). One was hooked up to my VIC-20. The rest were black and white sets in bedrooms, many of them aging and barely working.


And the cart NEVER pulls the horse. Simply having a product doesn't create demand, and having an extremely expensive product doesn't lend to a high rate of adoption.

It is content which drives the market. In surveys of intent to purchase HDTV, the #1 reason cited for not buying (next to price) was lack of content. The availability and ubiquitity of hi-def optical media certainly WILL influence consumers to get an HDTV. All CE product follows the standard market uptake curve: pioneer, early adopter, early majority, late majority, and laggard. CE product pricing follows this curve.

It has never been a problem in the past, and no new CE market that I can think of, started with a product originally priced so that late majority types can afford them. Not radios, not TVs, not cars, not VCRs, not DVDs, not computers, not mobile phones, and not even consoles.

Given manufacturing cost curves, and the known adoption curve, it makes little sense to cut prices so low unless you have a vigorous competitor (e.g. price war). HDTV has no competitor for next-gen display format. They have no fear that if uptake is too slow, they will be frozen out of the market. HDTV is inevitable.

Many studies predict that HDTV prices are already transistioning from the luxury to mainstream and that 2006 could be the breakout year.

HDTV will NEVER be mainstream until it is priced for the mainstream market. That's sub-$300 sets with over 27" of screen size. Unitl HDTV can match that, it will always be the bastard child set owned only by the rich. Everyone wants a Ferrari, but you don't see them outselling Honda any time soon, do you?

Unless you think the middle class are rich, you're wrong. Middle class consumers are already financing the purchase of $600-1000 sets this year. Secondly, does $350 30" widescreen CRT count?

Summary: year over year sales of HDTVs are growing exponentially. By the time the PS3 is launched, roughly 1 in 5 households should have one. In 2006, we have HD-DVD, PS3/BluRay, and DirectTV's launch of 1000 HD stations in 2007. All of these carts are being manufactured before the horse, and horses are going to bridle themselves onto them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
seismologist said:
What do you know once again Powderkeg shows up to steer the conversation off course. What were we arguing about again?

Oh boy I just realized that I'm confusing Powerkeg with PC-Engine. Who is usually one to jump in to conversation with a similarly aggressive tone. My appologies to Powerkeg.

But that doesn't change the fact that I think it's pointless to argue whether BR is justified based on HDTV adoption rates. Nobody knows this better than Sony and they're working off alot more data than you find by searching google so yeah like I said it's pointless trying to argue this.
 
Bigus Dickus said:
The problem with assuming everyone will want a HD movie format to go with their HDTV is that you ignore the reality that current progressive scan 480p DVD's look substantially better on an HDTV than people are accustomed to seeing on their old SDTV sets. People don't really "need" a HD movie format to enjoy the improvements their HDTV brings.

It's marketing. Regardless of whether they can see a difference, marketers will convince them they can. And consumers are more educated than you think. One of the principle concerns given in intent-to-purchase surveys is content availability. That means people want HD content, even if it's just psychological.

The studios want next-gen formats more so than just to resell their library. They want the increased anti-piracy protection, and come hell or high horse, they are going to see existing DVD inventory driven down over time.
 
seismologist said:
Oh boy I just realized that I'm confusing Powerkeg with PC-Engine. Who is usually one to jump in to conversation with a similarly aggressive tone. My appologies to Powerkeg.

But that doesn't change the fact that I think it's pointless to argue whether BR is justified based on HDTV adoption rates. Nobody knows this better than Sony and they're working off alot more data than you find by searching google so yeah like I said it's pointless trying to argue this.

More than that, if you look at for example, DirectTV, they made an ENORMOUS investment into HD. THey must have saw something.
 
DemoCoder said:
Summary: year over year sales of HDTVs are growing exponentially. By the time the PS3 is launched, roughly 1 in 5 households should have one. In 2006, we have HD-DVD, PS3/BluRay, and DirectTV's launch of 1000 HD stations in 2007. All of these carts are being manufactured before the horse, and horses are going to bridle themselves onto them.
You raise good points about the validity or potential of an HD disc format. But this thread is about it's impact, or lack of one, on the PS3. It seems in this regards the numbers are on Powderkeg's side.

.Sis
 
DemoCoder said:
It's marketing. Regardless of whether they can see a difference, marketers will convince them they can. And consumers are more educated than you think. One of the principle concerns given in intent-to-purchase surveys is content availability. That means people want HD content, even if it's just psychological.

The studios want next-gen formats more so than just to resell their library. They want the increased anti-piracy protection, and come hell or high horse, they are going to see existing DVD inventory driven down over time.
You seem to be suggesting that with enough marketing every consumer electronics device will be a success. Surely this isn't the case, therefore your argument that "marketing" will make the difference is suspect. Otherwise, the DVD audio formats would be successful?

.Sis
 
Sis said:
You raise good points about the validity or potential of an HD disc format. But this thread is about it's impact, or lack of one, on the PS3. It seems in this regards the numbers are on Powderkeg's side.

.Sis
I wouldn't necessarily say that, since that isn't really what Powderkeg has been arguing (the validity of it in the PS3) for most of the thread -- his original post was on the possibility, in his opinion, that it might be a blunder for Sony to include it as it might not take off as a format until PS4 came out. His original post was making some rather grand assumptions (like "Most people still own SDTV sets, and the majority of them will still own the same sets in another 5 years" -- which doesn't look like its going to be true with the way HDTVs have been selling). I don't think anyone had a problem with that, really, it was this post that the wackiness started:

Powderkeg said:
Well, that would be your fault for buying into a format before it was ready for mainstream adoption.

There are 300+ million people in the US. There are also an estimated 300+ million television sets in the country.

Only an estimated 16 million HDTV's have been sold in the US.

In otherwords, there are 284 million Americans who don't care what your HDTV wants.
which was based off completely wonky figures.
 
It's inevitable!!...where the money flows so will the market...check it...

US dollars analog versus digital:

From CEA (2006): Digital-9.8 billion dolars and as it increases analog is decreasing to 2.5 billion dollars.
 
Back
Top