ATI to delay 80nm GPU migration?

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by kemosabe, Mar 17, 2006.

  1. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242
    I think it's going to be more like

    G80 (NV50) on 80nm - Fall 2006

    "G81" ("NV51") speedbump on 65nm - Q1 or Q2, 2007

    G90 (NV55) a major refresh - on 65nm - H2, 2007

    "G91" ("NV58") or whatever, a speed bump of the refresh (ala G71) on 65nm or 45nm - H1, 2008

    then finally, G100 (NV60) on 45nm - H2, 2008

    we're not going to see NV60 / NV6X until 2008, with NV50 arriving late 2006, we will see all the usual speedbumps, refreshes and speedbumped refreshes, as we have the last 3-4 years.
     
  2. oeLangOetan

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    optical shrinks aren't done anymore, most propperties change significantly enaugh to redo the chip almost entirely but obviously there are tools to make the transition betwean 90nm & 80nm very smooth, but it takes a lot more time than a optical die shrink would
     
  3. Richthofen

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2002
    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    3

    In my opinion this is very likely. My bet is that in 2007 AMD will offer foundry service to Nvidia. My bet would be less complicated designs for instance chipsets and IGPs and i still think that once FAB36 is running quite well AMD will start to deploy new tools/machines to FAB30 for smaller process nodes. But they will do that not in a hurry.
    FAB30 is still to tempting for AMD to drop it. The location is great because distance to FAB36 is - well rather small :) -.
    I also can imagine that they are trying to experiment with Nvidia on a combined CPU/GPU part in the long.

    I think they will do something together in 2007 and i think it is kind of a foundry agreement.
     
  4. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    471
    I'm not sure how to understand it... RV560/570 will be delayed?/cancelled?/produced on 90nm?/or only UMC vesion will be available?/... [​IMG]
     
  5. Blazkowicz

    Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,607
    Likes Received:
    256
    I first thought that RV560 was the 8 pipe 128bit version of RV530/R580 in 90nm, and RV570 was the shrink to 80nm.

    now there's this rumors of 8 pipe 128bit RV560 on 80nm, and 12 pipe 256bits RV570 on 80nm but I find it hard to believe; why make a X1900 without one of its quad. 256bits bus would make the cards expensive, so why not just use a R580. Or a R590. What would be the use of such a RV570 when you're already making the R590 to provide cheaper X1900's?

    I sure don't think ATI has produced enough R520 for X1800GTO to compete against the 7600GT for another 8 monthes or so; 90nm RV560 seems logic to me (as a scaling of RV530/R580) and would be much needed by ATI imo.
     
  6. trumphsiao

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    11
    My presumption :

    RV560/RV570 will be a refined R580 architecture which have 3 Quad per dispatch processor compared to R580/RV530 specs with 4 Quad per dispatch processor will have better ALU utilization . However , the rumor previously had that RV570 is a 12 Quad PS seems unlogicial to me from primary cost issue point of view.
     
  7. kemosabe

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    While waiting for 80nm to gets its kinks fixed, anyone care to speculate on what 90nm chip(s) UMC will be producing for ATI? RV515 would be an obvious guess, but any reason to think they might want to fab a more complex ASIC on UMC's 90nm process?
     
  8. Dave Baumann

    Dave Baumann Gamerscore Wh...
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2002
    Messages:
    14,090
    Likes Received:
    694
    Location:
    O Canada!
  9. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    R581? R580+? Seems likes he on the trail of everything but "R590"
     
  10. compres

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Germany
    I am pretty sure he will soon change the code name to R590.
     
  11. kemosabe

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    Seems like a rather uninteresting trail no matter where it leads. He should be barking up the RV560/570 tree instead.
     
  12. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30649

    Gasp! It supports GDDR4!

    Oh, wait, R580 already supports GDDR4.

    Ahhh, but this is more polished GDDR4 support.

    I can't tell whether he's predicting it will actually have GDDR4 memory on the boards or not. . .and suspect I'm not intended to.
     
  13. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    GDDR4 on future GPUs will be a bandwidth eulogy for all vendors.
     
  14. tEd

    tEd Casual Member
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    70
    Location:
    switzerland
    Near future ati products won't have any gddr4. R600 probably being the first one

    RickBergman: Roadmaps, roadmaps, that is what everyone wants from us! All we can say is that it’s coming though. We have no products to announce that will use it in the near future. I think the reason for this is because GDDR3 went so much higher than anyone expected and it means there has been no real urgency for GDDR4. It is true though that GDDR4 will bring with it some performance improvements when used in conjunction with our memory controller.
     
  15. Sunrise

    Regular

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2002
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    21
    :lol:

    Now this one is lovely.

    INQ being "smart" again, while also revealing exactly, well: nothing.
     
  16. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    471
    :shock:

    [​IMG]
     
    Geo likes this.
  17. Dave Baumann

    Dave Baumann Gamerscore Wh...
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2002
    Messages:
    14,090
    Likes Received:
    694
    Location:
    O Canada!
  18. satein

    Regular

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Sheffield, UK.
  19. tEd

    tEd Casual Member
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    70
    Location:
    switzerland
  20. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    471
    Sorry for mystification... :oops: anyway, good joke :grin:
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...