Anand has Farcry 1.2 patch and tests SM3.0

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Helevitia, Jul 2, 2004.

  1. Ante P

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no idea. :)

    TB tried supplying a new build of the app but it refuses to work on my rig and the debug versions doesn't create an error log so we're kind of at a stand still now that we don't know how to solve.
     
  2. Hyp-X

    Hyp-X Irregular
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,170
    Likes Received:
    5
    In case you missed that:

     
  3. nAo

    nAo Nutella Nutellae
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,400
    Likes Received:
    440
    Location:
    San Francisco
    I have the feeling they used dynamic branching to avoid to sample 2 different resolutions depth maps in some cases. Samples are taken and percentage close filtered from a single depth map..and from another one. Sampled signal is then filtered between the 2 maps..like in trilinear filtering.
    When the filtering coefficient is almost zero or almost one you just avoid to sample both and you just sample the higher or the lower resolution depth map, thus saving bandwith and ALU cycles. This would easily explain the big improvements in performance we're seeing on that test..
    BriLinear Depth Shadow Mapping anyone? ;)
    Obviously this is just an hypothesis..sorry if I completely missed the target.

    ciao,
    Marco
     
  4. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,777
    Likes Received:
    1,814
    Nice to see Derek respond so quickly and update the article so transparently. It's a total turnaround from last year's mess.

    Still, I have to (stubbornly) admit that it's disappointing that a profitable site can still make such mistakes.
     
  5. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    Can't disagree there. Could be that time pressure is one of the possible explanations, yet still not a good enough excuse; not at least for a slip like that.

    It takes fractions of seconds in a running timedemo to detect with the naked eye whether antialiasing is on or not. Presupposition would be of course that you actually watch the screen while it's running....*cough*
     
  6. dizietsma

    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    13
    But remember your thoughts on temporal AA until someone pointed out you had not even enabled it yet ... :oops:
     
  7. Jack_Tripper

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2003
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Asslanta
    Now you ARE doing that with you're 6800 review...right????

    :D

    Jack
     
  8. Demigod

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    2
  9. dizietsma

    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,172
    Likes Received:
    13
    Anandtech have fixed the results but not the conclusion, first part of their conclusion reads

    "Both of our custom benchmarks show ATI cards leading without anisotropic filtering and antialiasing enabled, with NVIDIA taking over when the options are enabled."

    Which is completely out of phase with the new results.

    Sigh.

    My apolgies to jvd and rainz for saying now you get speed with AA/AF with SM3, nope Ati is still king when it comes to AA and AF in this game :)
     
  10. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    O'm tupongg bkindfodled :lol:
     
  11. Draconis

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well now after reading this stuff about anandtech with the new results I wont go to that site anymore.
     
  12. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    Well, I still give 'em points for updating the graph so quickly. That is a much different reaction than last time and a muchly better way of handling it. 8)

    Besides, if they changed the conclusion the changed graph results wouldn't be as "transparent". ;)
     
  13. thop

    thop Great Member
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]

    The word is already out there, so the update is too late.
     
  14. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    The sad thing is, they didn't even update their conclusion paragraphs. The evidence observed contradicts their conclustion:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    EDIT: damn, I must still be sleeping since I didnt see this mentioned just a couple of posts earlier.
     
  15. Mr. Travis

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    the sad part is how common basic errors are on hardware sites... would it kill anyone to take the time to do things right?
     
  16. Humus

    Humus Crazy coder
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    77
    Location:
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Anand seems to be very frequent on making errors.
     
  17. rainz

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    Yeh but i think it's not really an " errors ".. If you know what i mean. :roll: :wink:

    EDIT: and Btw Humus ! nice demo again ! and continue your good job ! :wink:

    RainZ
     
  18. jvd

    jvd
    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Messages:
    12,724
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    new jersey
    no prob , thats what happens on the net .

    Btw the 4.7 betas are even faster than these
     
  19. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,992
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    It is a bit suspect that he didn't change his conclusion even though the new results invalidate it. :?
     
  20. Kombatant

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Milton Keynes, UK
    I believe they're not doing anything fishy... they were just sloppy with the said review (which imho is inexcusable for a "professional" site, but anyways)...
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...