AMD: Southern Islands (7*** series) Speculation/ Rumour Thread

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by UniversalTruth, Dec 17, 2010.

  1. rpg.314

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,298
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    /
    Their problems in pro market aren't related to mem bw and would not be fixed in any way whatsoever by throwing wider bus at Tahiti.
     
  2. rpg.314

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,298
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    /
    While it's possible that it might have escaped notice, I don't remember you arguing for it before.
     
  3. Alexko

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,541
    Likes Received:
    964
    Kepler is a full node ahead of GF100, so you can expect a FLOPS increase close to 2×. The FLOPS/bandwidth ratio has been continually increasing over the last generations, so I wouldn't expect the same increase in bandwidth, but it should still go up by quite a bit to avoid severe bottlenecks.

    Plus, running GDDR rated for 6GHz at this very speed is not easy, it requires a lot of effort on the memory controller and PHY—an area where NVIDIA doesn't particularly shine—and can be relatively inefficient, power-wise. So a 512-bit bus doesn't sound unrealistic at all.

    Not that I have any inside information or personal experience of this, just my 2 cents.
     
  4. fellix

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,552
    Likes Received:
    514
    Location:
    Varna, Bulgaria
    R600 graphics core was quite a bit smaller than the die size alone suggested. The memory interface padding at the perimeter was mostly stacked and took a generous portion of the IC area, which is the reason for the "miraculous" fitting of 512-bit interface in just 420 sq.mm at 80nm process. A very unbalanced design, later beaten by RV670.
     
  5. Jawed

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,716
    Likes Received:
    2,137
    Location:
    London
  6. LordEC911

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    877
    Likes Received:
    208
    Location:
    'Zona
    Well if Cypress' MC is almost twice the size of Redwood's just to move from 4.2Ghz to 4.8Ghz and we have no idea how much larger Cayman's MC is to hit 5.5ghz maybe they thought it would be much easier to up the bus size and use a smaller/simpler, though slower, MC to get the bandwidth increase they wanted.
     
  7. denev2004

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    China
    I worried about the memory limit as well. 7xxx series should required more bandwidth with a new design of SM.
    a 384bit MC must be helpful.
     
  8. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
  9. silent_guy

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,754
    Likes Received:
    1,382
  10. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
    I' am actually looking forward to see XDR2 in action compare to GDDR5 on Radeon GPU.
     
  11. UniversalTruth

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,747
    Likes Received:
    22
    Is he sure? :lol:
    Sorry, but if the GDDR5 modules' in GTX680 price is 80 $, but the XDR2 modules for Tahiti XT are about ~150 $, then what are we doing?
    That will give nvidia a strong and very noticeable advantage. :wink:

    +1. :)
     
    #991 UniversalTruth, Nov 21, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 21, 2011
  12. AlexV

    AlexV Heteroscedasticitate
    Moderator Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    144
    Pulling random numbers out of thin air, it would appear. Let's stop doing that. Another example is Anand's claims about the MCs in Redwood and respectively Cypress, which are bogus (only some bits of the MC actually abide that relationship, not it as a whole) - yet the Internetz is running with it with great speed, it would appear.
     
  13. UniversalTruth

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,747
    Likes Received:
    22
    I'm pretty confident about the 80 $ number. It should be in that ballpark, if my memory serves well. I have seen a very nice table (which, of course I cannot find now but you can help me) with all the components' prices for Radeons and GeForces. :)
    Ok, obviously you think that this 80% higher price is too much.
    Then, what's your guess or information about prices?

    I cannot find anything on Elpida, Hynix, Micron and Samsung websites about XDR2, no announcements about memory speeds or prices, nothing. :shock:
     
  14. Man from Atlantis

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    855
    ah you mean this (bottom of the page)
     
  15. denev2004

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    China
    Actually XDR2 couldn't be used in Low-End cos the price.
    And different MC may cause more money in redesign compared to a flexible desgin
     
  16. Love_In_Rio

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,627
    Likes Received:
    226
    Maybe AMD is going with XDR2 because they had to design a XDR2 memory controller for PS4 GPU...
     
  17. fehu

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,068
    Likes Received:
    992
    Location:
    Somewhere over the ocean
    i'm not for the xdr theory, but highend and lowend gpu haven't different mc yet?
     
  18. AlphaWolf

    AlphaWolf Specious Misanthrope
    Legend

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    9,470
    Likes Received:
    1,686
    Location:
    Treading Water
    If the 7xxx series is going to use xdr2, where are they going to get the ram from? I mean who is going to produce it? as apparently no one has even produced a sample of xdr2 yet. Or has 7xxx been moved back to late in 2012?
     
  19. TKK

    TKK
    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    In my opinion, this whole "XDR2 for HD 7000 high-end" is BS.
    It probably started as an enthusiast's speculation/wishful thinking/wet dream, was picked up by a site that of course didn't name any source, then other sites picked up that story for teh clickz, and now many of the enthusiasts among their readers apply the it's all over the net and I want it to be true, so it must be true™-filter and defend it vigorously.

    My personal I learned the hard way that such rumors usually turn out to be a pile of goo™-filter tells me we'll probably see at most a 384-bit controller with mildly increased GDDR5 clocks on Tahiti. Best case.

    But we won't see anything fancy until one of the following generations introduces an interposer + stacked memory.
     
  20. denev2004

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    China
    It's like a desgin with modularization now.


    Exactly
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...