UniversalTruth
Veteran
After all it is people's choice how much they want to be charged. If they are ready to throw their money, why not, it's theirs...
It's hard to justify $459 680's but that's what Nvidia gets away with pricing them at anyway.
Yes but why price something for $600 when you can price it at $800
The 700 series needs to have 25-35% improvement vs the 600 series and I see no way to increase the GTX680 by that amount while staying on 28nm. Why spend $$$ on new layouts when existing silicon (GTX110) is available to fill the 700 product lineup.and have something else at $549-$599?
Why spend $$$ on new layouts when existing silicon (GTX110) is available to fill the 700 product lineup.
Because the difference between the 550mm2 and 293mm2 die is huge, the latter having double the die per wafer and a years longer production time on top of that.
Nvidia needs to be able to meet the demand for the entire range and there is no way that a 550mm2 chip can cover the volume required for the whole 700 series.
The 2013 Nvidia Lineup: GTX780 is Titan LE, GTX770 is GTX680, GTX760Ti is GTX670?
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...2c-gtx770-is-gtx6802c-gtx760ti-is-gtx670.aspx
Why does it make a difference that one is longer in production than the other? They use the same process...Because the difference between the 550mm2 and 293mm2 die is huge, the latter having double the die per wafer and a years longer production time on top of that.
Why not? 500+mm2 dies have been used before, on immature processes even. There's no reason it can't happen again. And 28nm should be rock solid by now.Nvidia needs to be able to meet the demand for the entire range and there is no way that a 550mm2 chip can cover the volume required for the whole 700 series.
Why the heck do you even think much less believe that the GK110 would cover the entire 700 lineup.
All of the published stories show only the GTX 780 using the GK110 and the GTX 770 and GTX 760ti would use the GK104 – 425.
http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/31167-geforce-gtx-780-770-coming-in-may
I don't, it was you who said that's what they should do?
So why are you talking about GK110 filling the 700 product lineup? Make up your mind.
Your mind is the one that is has gotten confused. Partially reading posts seem to be one reason you have been getting confused.
The discussion was about filling out the high-end of Nvidia's 700 series with the GK110 and somehow you translate that to the entire 700 line-up.
My other posts on this subject have shown links and descriptions that have shown that the GTX 770 and GTX 760ti will be based on the GK104.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1729201&postcount=6164
How you get "entire line-up" from the word "fill" in the discussion about the Titan, $600 & $800 graphics cards and the GTX 680 is just one example of how out-of-context quotes and not reading the entire post seems to be confusing you.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1729933&postcount=4623
Aside from that we have gems about Nvidia "putting the hurt on AMD" (with a $600 card? Which card has AMD got in that space?)(GTX110) is available to fill the 700 product lineup.
I did read ...
It's the same with releasing a faster GK104 with double the VRAM and $60 cheaper. WHY would they do that? They are simply competing with themselves as AMD has comparatively little presence in the high end anyway.
Because the market demands a product refresh. Launching the 7xx creates demand which will be greater than that for the existing 6xx series at this point in it's life.
NV want to sell products, the only way to encourage the market to buy them is to keep releasing better ones.
I may be "the Drooler", so I have a hardtime understanding what this has to do with AMD's 7****. Or any card that starts with a 7 is now in this thread? Well back to my towel.I don't disagree, however the point I'm making is about...pulling shit out of my ass...