So, what are the chances of TSV/stacked DRAM/HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) debuting with HD 8000?
I would think the HD8000 series comes too early for that.
Geez, like your basis for calling it Tenerife is any better.
Anyone else have an opinion?
Remember the rumors about the HD7970 and the XDR2 rambus .. and finally it was just GDDR5. Seriously the 7970 have allready 264GB/s of memory bandwith.. let say the next is at 300GB/s.. largely enough even with eyefinity setup..
Top parts are the only parts, right?
HD 8000 will be largely just and simply revised HD 7000. I don't know why you want so major changes.
Stacked memory may debute with APUs, not videocards.
The lower the videocards market segment, the lower the need of such a major change leading to improved memory bandwidth.
Now you can explain why you need stacked memory on HD 8670.
According to Fudzilla, AMD has already told some of its partners that company is aiming to add a DirectX 11.1 support to their newest GPUs. It’s pretty obvious information, while it’s unimaginable that upcoming series of graphics cards would not support the latest DirectX (not yet released though). Anyway, it’s semi-official right now. And we should expect the same from NVIDIA. There were plenty of rumors almost a year ago that actual Kepler GPUs would support it, as it turned out, they don’t.
Which one?Lastly, it’s also said that the architecture of Sea Islands GPUs will receive many changes. Then comparing the same number of cores in GPUs from Northern Islands and Sea Islands will not correspond to the same performance (this would also throw out the rumored Radeon HD 8970 specification that was leaked months ago).
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1653076&postcount=312"Tenerife" (let's call it in this way) might be a 5100 MTrans at ~410 mm^2 beast with 2560 SPs , 160 TMUs, 32 or 48 ROPs, 384bit GDDR5 and 30-40% faster than Tahiti.
Someone should tell these guys that Southern Islands arch is out and it already supports DX11.1. The change in the shaders (4D->1D) is also there.
Exactly.
fehu, it's quite small additions, but at least parts of it requires hardware support eg HD5/6 and GTX4/5 (and Fermi-based 6) don't support it.
Nvidia said, that Kepler supports DX11.1 (at launch), but it wasn't written in any official presentation as far as I remember.Kepler-based 6 don't support DX11.1 either.
http://www.geforce.co.uk/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-680/specifications
Nvidia said, that Kepler supports DX11.1 (at launch), but it wasn't written in any official presentation as far as I remember.
Yes, it isn't very typical. I asked local PR (just a day before launch) if the GTX 680 supports DX11 or 11.1. I was told, that he found one mention of DX11.1 in some internal document, so he believes it supports DX11.1.
AFAIK no.Also is it true that 11.1 is strictly Windows 8?
Nvidia said, that Kepler supports DX11.1 (at launch), but it wasn't written in any official presentation as far as I remember.
AFAIK no.
The exact quote, IIRC, was "yes, it supports DX11.1, but who cares?"