So that was unique to that specific engine and cannot be replicated by others. Bf1 is an interesting candidate for the next one, for some reason the 6900 is a beast but ryzen is at i5 lv
https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2013/01/29/write-combining-is-not-your-friend/So that was unique to that specific engine and cannot be replicated by others. Bf1 is an interesting candidate for the next one, for some reason the 6900 is a beast but ryzen is at i5 lv
What do you mean? BF1 is like the poster child for Ryzen. The minimum/avg fps and the frametime graphs are amazing on Ryzen. Anyone who has BF1 raves how smooth it is on their Ryzen setups, me included.Bf1 is an interesting candidate for the next one, for some reason the 6900 is a beast but ryzen is at i5 lv
What do you mean? BF1 is like the poster child for Ryzen. The minimum/avg fps and the frametime graphs are amazing on Ryzen. Anyone who has BF1 raves how smooth it is on their Ryzen setups, me included.
This:
In many review its on pair with i5 4690 / 6600.
It makes a huge difference. The single player doesn't stress the cpu much at all compared to the multiplayer. The consistent frametimes on Ryzen make a much smoother overall gaming experience that a simple average fps on a single player built-in benchmark just cannot show.Does it really matter?
It makes a huge difference. The single player doesn't stress the cpu much at all compared to the multiplayer. The consistent frametimes on Ryzen make a much smoother overall gaming experience that a simple average fps on a single player built-in benchmark just cannot show.
Computerbase.de have full MP tests for BF1 and other MP games with excellent graph systems to isolate specific games as desired.
View attachment 1939 View attachment 1940 View attachment 1941
Unfortunately, for consistency sake, I think CB only tests multiplayer on empty maps, So there is little useful data here.It makes a huge difference. The single player doesn't stress the cpu much at all compared to the multiplayer. The consistent frametimes on Ryzen make a much smoother overall gaming experience that a simple average fps on a single player built-in benchmark just cannot show.
Well that sucks, not really an MP test then lol. It's what I could find in short notice but unfortunately for obvious reasons reviewers don't really benchmark MP much.Unfortunately, for consistency sake, I think CB only tests multiplayer on empty maps, So there is little useful data here.
Another data point worth pondering is the disparity between DX11 and DX12 scores: The minimal difference between the 7700K and the 1800X in DX11 (1800X is 5% faster). And the huge difference between them in DX12 (7700K is 35% faster).
I wonder if these two things are related?While there wasn't the RX 480 update yet, PCGH included Broadwell-E numbers, the min FPS seem to fall apart when using CPUs with many cores:
3d Mark API overhead test paints a complete different picture of Ryzen draw call performance:CB testing shows all AMD CPUs taking a massive hit under DX12, here the API appears to be bound by single threaded performance as the 7700K climbs it's way to the top.
Your initial supposition was that Ryzen didn't perform well in BF1 compared to other 8 core CPUs, and I'm trying to show that is does. Just not in single player, which is irrelevant for that particular game.I think you missed the point... IT was not about which CPU is better is was about what improvement could ryzen get there with a software update.
Your initial supposition was that Ryzen didn't perform well in BF1 compared to other 8 core CPUs, and I'm trying to show that is does. Just not in single player, which is irrelevant for that particular game.