I mean market share, according to the recent Jon Peddie report. If the clock speed was meant to be as high as Bondrewd et al. are reporting, it's a big miss and not the kind of issue AMD needs right now.
Bondrewd
Veteran
AIB share.
It's plenty faster lol.
Just not as fast as it should've been.
They're all samey variants of N5.
It's huge failure because the big boy isn't quite the PPA slam dunk the lesser ones shall be soon enough.
Yeah, it only breaks once you plug it in, lol
Seriously, i've heard some NV things did not work out as well as hoped too. Does not mean it's broken.
First Alleged AMD Radeon RX 7900-series Benchmarks Leaked
With only a couple of days to go until the AMD RX 7900-series benchmarks go live, some alleged benchmarks from both the RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT have leaked on Twitter. The two cards are being compared to a NVIDIA RTX 4080 card in no less than seven different game titles, all running at 4K...
They ship defective by design software (driver) tho.
The anti mining stuff like licking clocks to lowest when computer being used headless, etc are a pain (and dp dummy plug didn't work, only hdmi dummy plug work to circumvent it)
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Reference Graphics Card Listed At Amazon France For 1319 Euros
AMD's Radeon RX 7900 XTX has been listed for a price of 1319 Euros at Amazon France which is around 40% more expensive than the MSRP.
wccftech.com
Begun it has
arstechnica.com
Review: AMD’s Radeon RX 7900 GPUs are great 4K gaming GPUs—with caveats
New $899 and $999 GPUs maintain the status quo in the Nvidia-AMD rivalry.
arstechnica.com
Bondrewd
Veteran
Very bad giving it slams in power limits.
Bondrewd
Veteran
It's broken.
Don't touch it until it gets its 800MHz back.
DegustatoR
Legend
Well yeah in absolute fps numbers it's okay (although looking into benchmark mix is always advisable).
When you look at competition though you're getting a 58B transistors GPU being about equal to 46B in "rasterization" (vs AD103) and to 28.3B in raytracing (vs GA102).
RT performance is exactly where everyone was expecting it to be: on GA102 levels.
A review Thread for those who may not have noticed:
forum.beyond3d.com
AMD RX 7900XTX and RX 7900XT Reviews
7900XTX is the same performance as 4080 in rasterization at 4K, the 4080 is faster by 25% in ray tracing. https://www.computerbase.de/2022-12/amd-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-xt-review-test/
forum.beyond3d.com
Well, that aged like milk
Bondrewd
Veteran
Yea that happens, it really is dying at 350W.
DegustatoR
Legend
I dunno why anyone's still paying any attention to the guy.
Their only really saving point is that these should genuinely be relatively affordable to make, so if they can at least sell them, it's still decent money.
Definitely gonna do undue a lot of the positive feelings people had about Radeon GPU's after RDNA2, though.
And while I've got nothing to contribute to the idea of them being 'broken' or not, I think it's undeniable that this is well below expectations, and even well below AMD's own claims by more than an explainable margin. Given the jump to 5nm, 'brand new' architecture, and decent development length, a 35% performance gain is just very hard to explain. This cant have been what AMD was actually aiming for. Something went wrong somewhere.
Now that we have a production game using UE5.1, I'd really like to start seeing benchmarks of performance comparison for Nanite and Lumen. With so many developers moving to UE5, I think the reliance on hardware RT isn't going be as high as the industry was moving to previously.
Similar threads
