That is a bit confusing what it is. It is FSR2 + ??Hopefully the Hyper-RX is easy to implement and brings genuine latency improvements.
That is a bit confusing what it is. It is FSR2 + ??Hopefully the Hyper-RX is easy to implement and brings genuine latency improvements.
To me, it appears to be not only on par. But I can be wrong.They bought Xilinx so they could catch up?
Compute Units 96
Base Frequency 1900 MHz
Boost Frequency Up to 2500 MHz
Game Frequency 2300 MHz
Ray Accelerators 96
Peak Pixel Fill-Rate Up to 480 GP/s
Peak Texture Fill-Rate Up to 960 GT/s
Peak Half Precision Compute Performance 123 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision Compute Performance 61 TFLOPs
ROPs 192
Stream Processors 6144
Texture Units 384
Transistor Count 58 B
Shader Engines 6
Typical Board Power (Desktop) 355 W
Minimum PSU Recommendation 800 W
GPU Memory
Infinity Cache 96 MB
Memory Speed 20 Gbps
Max Memory Size 24 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth Up to 960 GB/s
Effective Memory Bandwidth Up to 3500 GB/s
You would have to think for the performance they mentioned it must include FSR2 in addition to their other existing technologies.That is a bit confusing what it is. It is FSR2 + ??
Sounded like that Geforce Experience Optimizer thingy.That is a bit confusing what it is. It is FSR2 + ??
900$ and 1000$ for the cards
That is a bit confusing what it is. It is FSR2 + ??
Not only that but at that price range who goes "oh no, 100$/€ difference is too much, im not going to spend 1k, im getting the 900$/€", not just silly but plain stupid price segmentation.General comment about marketing everywhere -- they really need to stop these silly $xxx.99 price points, as they're not fooling anyone. Just say it's $1000 and $900.
As it should since they have no way to properly respond to their competitor's flagship ...$999 7900 XTX for ~1.5x raster (bit more with RT) vs 6950XT and $899 7900 XT, that's better than expected
Well, Nvidia was originally planning to offer 3090 Ti class performance for $899.Yeah, frankly terrible. You could argue it might have been justified if AMD had been able to drastically improve RT performance, but if anything it looks like it's going to be even more of a stomp this gen than last.
The 7900XTX feels like a max $700 card, and at $600 it would sell very well. A 4090 is absolutely worth 50% more, without a question.
AMD is going to lose most of the mindshare they got from RDNA 2, and they can't even create a "recession savior from greedy Nvidia" narrative, because they've become almost as greedy.
And I don't think the disappointment everyone is feeling isn't the result of some unreasonable hype train either. More likely AMD was intentionally spreading misinformation ("appear strong when you are weak") to trick Nvidia into pushing their cards further than they needed to. And that part worked (fuck the planet, I guess), but now AMD's performance looks even worse.