AMD Radeon RDNA2 Navi (RX 6500, 6600, 6700, 6800, 6900 XT)

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by BRiT, Oct 28, 2020.

  1. no-X

    no-X Veteran

    Could you name a single product, which offers better performance for the same price or lower price for the same performance? The so called "$249" GeForce RTX 3050 costs $599 (the cheapest available models at Amazon and NewEgg), compared to $269 for Radeon RX 6500 XT. Yes, one of these two products has terrible price / performance ratio, but it's not Radeon RX 6500 XT.
     
    Lightman likes this.
  2. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful Legend

    Cheapest 6500 I could find was $289, and I'd take a 1650 over it for $10 more.
     
  3. no-X

    no-X Veteran

    Lightman and digitalwanderer like this.
  4. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful Legend

    Vanilla 1650 has h264 decoding hardware. :p

    EDITED BITS: The very fact that it's available and even near retail should be a SCREAMING red light to anyone in the current times of just how bad it is.
     
    pharma and Picao84 like this.
  5. Wesker

    Wesker Regular

    This isn’t an issue if you have a CPU with an IGP. So most Intel users in this price class should be fine.

    But yes: the GPU market is depressing.
     
    digitalwanderer likes this.
  6. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful Legend

    I haven't used an Intel CPU since the Pentium III. :|
     
  7. DegustatoR

    DegustatoR Veteran

    Most Intel users will be on PCIE 3.0 and certainly not "fine" with a 6500XT because of that.
     
  8. CarstenS

    CarstenS Legend Subscriber

    So does the RX 6500 XT. It's lacking AV1 decode (as does the 1650) and H.264/H.265 (HEVC) encode.
     
    no-X, digitalwanderer, Pete and 2 others like this.
  9. swaaye

    swaaye Entirely Suboptimal Legend

    I've read that AMD VCE is pretty poor for realtime stream encoding...
     
    pharma and PSman1700 like this.
  10. Putas

    Putas Regular

    Plus this is shifting goals from the gaming product.
     
    digitalwanderer likes this.
  11. Wesker

    Wesker Regular

    Come off it.

    I'm clearly talking about hardware encoding and decoding.
     
  12. DegustatoR

    DegustatoR Veteran

    If you're talking about that only then there are no reasons to even buy a 6500XT for someone who has an iGPU. So either way what you're suggestion makes zero sense.
     
    digitalwanderer and PSman1700 like this.
  13. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful Legend

    My bad, I misunderstood. Thanks for setting me straight.

    I still dislike the 6500 though. ;)
     
    pharma, PSman1700 and CarstenS like this.
  14. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh Legend

    Well you won’t be doing any real-time encoding on a 6500xt anyway.
     
    swaaye likes this.
  15. Wesker

    Wesker Regular

    I’m not suggesting anyone to buy a 6500 XT.

    Put down the axe — I trashed the GPU previously in this thread.
     
    digitalwanderer likes this.
  16. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful Legend

    /me puts down the axe and smiles.
     
    Wesker likes this.
  17. gamervivek

    gamervivek Regular

    There were rumors of refresh for other chips, maybe laptop only and then Navi21 doesn't get one. Quite ambivalent at this point, refresh with faster memory is quite likely.

    https://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-...ed-for-mid-2022-launch-rx-6500-non-xt-in-may/

    RDNA3 this year could be the Navi33 only on 6nm while the MCM cards come out next year and so AMD will need something faster this year.

    That's fine, since Navi21 cards can hit 2.7-2.8GHz easily but get too power constrained. Using MPT some folks can run 6900XT around 2.9GHz and I've seen at least one guy get close to 3GHz on his 6900XT without LN2. So power/voltage improvements should be enough.

    And the record changed hands with even faster card,

    OGS Reclaims 3DMark Fire Strike Hall of Fame Top Spot With Insane 3.3 GHz AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Overclock

    https://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-...f-fame-top-spot-insane-3-3-ghz-overclock-ogs/

    4GHz should be the next frontier.
     
    w0lfram, Lightman, CarstenS and 2 others like this.
  18. Silent_Buddha

    Silent_Buddha Legend

    So then you agree that currently the 6500 XT is a better card than the RTX 3050? :)

    Currently, if you have PCIE 4, you'll on average pay over 200% more for an RTX 3050 to have ~25% more performance.

    If you only have PCIE 3, then worst case (not all cases) You may have up to 200% more performance on RTX 3050, but in general it'll probably be closer to 25-50% more performance, again for 200% or more cost. The RTX 3050 almost looks good there compared to the 6500 XT. :p

    MSRP while nice to look at on paper is almost meaningless if cards aren't available for that price.

    The market has the 6500 XT close where it should be. Everything else on the market is vastly overpriced.

    Technically it's not a good card. But when cost to the consumer is accounted for, it likely has the best performance to price ratio of anything available. :p

    Regards,
    SB
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2022
  19. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful Legend

    Nope, not one tiny little bit. :yes:
     
    DavidGraham likes this.
  20. PSman1700

    PSman1700 Legend

    None of these GPUs are any good deal, hardware prices arent really what they should be now. If you can hold out with your current system thats obviously a good idea. Due to shortage/mining etc my 2080Ti was probably the best GPU value/purchase ive ever done alongside the Ti4200 128 (oced to 4600 clocks). MSRP doesnt seem to exist atm, PS5 consoles are going for 12000kr here (over 1200USD), 3050 gpus for what you could get a 2070 or better for back in the day. Crazy.
     
    digitalwanderer likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...