AMD Radeon RDNA2 Navi (RX 6500, 6600, 6700, 6800, 6900 XT)

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by BRiT, Oct 28, 2020.

  1. pharma

    pharma Veteran

    Is there a link to the TechPowerUp results?
    Edit: Got it from the other thread.
     
  2. Flappy Pannus

    Flappy Pannus Regular

    Dude come on, you're really not the one on this site to use the 'triggered' accusation for other people. You need to dial it back a tad.
     
  3. PSman1700

    PSman1700 Legend

    Reporting doesnt help either. This user can do whatever he wants unfortanately. Try contacting Rys (the owner of this board).
     
  4. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■) Moderator Legend Alpha

    Not accurate. User is banned.
     
    pharma and PSman1700 like this.
  5. PSman1700

    PSman1700 Legend

    We didnt know, thanks ;)
     
  6. Lurkmass

    Lurkmass Regular

    Lightman and Krteq like this.
  7. CarstenS

    CarstenS Legend Subscriber

    Very nice results too:
     
  8. pharma

    pharma Veteran

    The Classroom scene usually depicts good performance for AMD, so will be interesting to see reviews using the full Blender testing suite.
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2021
    Lightman and PSman1700 like this.
  9. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh Legend

    What does it mean that the 3090 is faster vs Optix and CUDA. The 3090 is still running CUDA right just compiled from HIP?
     
  10. CarstenS

    CarstenS Legend Subscriber

    3090 is running CUDA and Optix, as before. Cycles X got faster. It does not, for instance, subdivide the picture in small tiles anymore.
     
    Lightman likes this.
  11. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh Legend

    Oh nice. Impressive gains for the 6900. OpenCL really does suck.
     
    Lightman likes this.
  12. xpea

    xpea Regular

    I would not call it impressive when you are more than 3 times slower than your competition... Even worst, half priced NV card is also faster...
     
    PSman1700 likes this.
  13. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh Legend

    That's a whole other story. Looking forward to a proper review but it does seem Ampere's abundance of flops is coming into play. Or maybe it's just due to maturity of CUDA vs HIP.
     
    Lightman, Krteq and PSman1700 like this.
  14. nAo

    nAo Nutella Nutellae Veteran

    It's likely the ray tracing HW also contributes to better perf..
     
  15. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh Legend

    For Optix sure but the CUDA path doesn't use RT hardware right? Is the HIP implementation using RT hardware on RDNA2?
     
    PSman1700 likes this.
  16. Lurkmass

    Lurkmass Regular

    There are no ray tracing APIs in HIP that I'm currently aware of. There used to be plans for an OpenCL ray tracing extension before it was shelved. Now that HIP is their official compute API even on Windows, they're looking into exposing ray tracing for it ...
     
    Lightman and Krteq like this.
  17. AlexV

    AlexV Heteroscedasticitate Moderator Veteran

    Whilst not necessarily ideal, we do expose (and have been exposing) the relevant builtins for a while: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104946. They map directly to the instructions described in 8.2.10 here https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/RDNA2_Shader_ISA_November2020.pdf, and can be used as-is in HIP __device__ code.
     
    Jawed, Pete, Silent_Buddha and 2 others like this.
  18. Lurkmass

    Lurkmass Regular

    Ah but nonetheless I still don't think it's been used yet in blender. What other improvements is your team planning to make ray tracing in a better state for HIP ?
     
  19. pharma

    pharma Veteran

    RDNA2 For Workstation: AMD Radeon Pro W6600 & W6800 Review – Techgage
    November 23, 2021
     
    Lightman, Krteq and PSman1700 like this.
Loading...

Share This Page

Loading...