AMD: R9xx Speculation

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Lukfi, Oct 5, 2009.

  1. chavvdarrr

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Sofia, BG
    me wants XXX0 :D
     
  2. MarkoIt

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    392
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's seems 28-29 cm long (length is 2.8 times width)

    Edit:
    Just for the sake of speculation:
    Antilles 6X70/6X50
    Cayman 6H70/6H50
    Bart 6P70/6P50
    Caicos 6M70/6M50

    X for extreme: 400-500$, >200 W TDP
    H for high-end: 300-400$, 150-200 W TDP
    P for performance: 200-300$, 100- 150 TDP
    M for mainstream: 100-200$, 50- 100 W TDP
    I for integrated

    First number is the generation number, letter is the target market, second and third model number
    It's more clear than the current naming scheme (for both price point and TDP point), and it could be used for much longer.
    (Radeon 10X70/10H70, i think is better than Radeon 10990.. it won't require to start the numeration again in few years)
     
    #2622 MarkoIt, Oct 6, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 6, 2010
  3. MarkoIt

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    392
    Likes Received:
    0
    69-70 vs 6-X-70?
    The latter is way more badass! :grin:
     
  4. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,669
    I'd prefer to go with 6990 for Antilles XT and 6995 for Antilles Pro
     
  5. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,451
    Likes Received:
    471
    it would be nice, but this slide says otherwise ("50" and "70")...

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,669
    hmm, now that's new. Ta.

    Wonder why it's such a big secret for a single digit, I can't see why the info can't be out there i.e. leaked. It's not like it's performance figures.
     
  7. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    So either
    Barts HD6700
    Cayman HD6800
    Antilles HD6900

    or
    Barts HD6800
    Cayman HD6900
    Antilles HD6X00 as someone suggested

    edit:
    Or could it be list for Turks, Barts and Cayman instead of Barts Cayman and Antilles?
     
  8. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,669
    I can only hope it's the top :)

    edit:
    Was thinking about it myself.
     
  9. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Though according to rumors Antilles would be released this year while lowend (Turks, Caicos) would slip to next year which would indicate this list is for Barts, Cayman and Antilles
     
  10. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,451
    Likes Received:
    471
    The HD6X00 is only my speculation :) I wasn't able to think out a better way how to fit the three models in, if Barts is HD6800. And especially if whe should pay attention to name of one series, as noticed in the slide.

    The gaps are different in length, but Barts + Turks aren't. I think Barts, Cayman and Antilles would fit better.
     
  11. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    But Antilles is shorter than Cayman to write unless you use capitals

    So it has to be one of these
    Barts
    Cayman
    Cayman X2

    or
    BARTS
    CAYMAN
    ANTILLES

    (or in theory
    Barts
    Caicos
    Cayman
    But this doesn't fit anything really as Caicos is supposed to be the slowest chip of the series)
     
  12. chavvdarrr

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,165
    Likes Received:
    34
    Location:
    Sofia, BG
    and usually XT > Pro
     
  13. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    That's not relevant, as Caicos, Turks and Barts wouldn't fit it anyway, which would be only explanation for why fastest series would be on top and still be Barts with the shortest name (together with Turks, their names are the same width regardless if you use capital or normal letters)
    So I believe it goes slowest to fastest from top to bottom on series, but fastest to slowest within each series
     
  14. racca

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    So it is somehow confirmed that there's no way to name Barts 6800 while keep the old naming scheme.

    You either name it 6700, or add 1 to each family thus breaking the "9" barrier.

    I still consider the former more viable. But HD6X70/50 sounds intriguing, too.

    Frankly, the "HD" sigh makes no sense now. If they are rebranding in this generation, AMD should be better off with NV/Intel or its own naming scheme. ie AA XXX where AA=targeted market (GTX, X6, i7), XXX=numers representing performance/generation.
    Or maybe it will happen next time around along with 32nm/28nm and desktop Fusion/Llano launch
     
  15. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    I don't agree really, IMO it's more clear for "average joe" to see HD6400, 6500, 6600, 6700, 6800, 6900 etc, than to go guessing if GT is worse than GTS is worse than GTX etc etc
     
  16. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,451
    Likes Received:
    471
    Keep in mind, that the person, who leaked these slides, stated, that Barts isn't HD6700.
     
  17. Alexko

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,541
    Likes Received:
    964
    Agreed. Meaningless prefixes, whatever they may be (GTS/GTX/Ultra/i5/i7/whatever) should go away.
     
  18. MarkoIt

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    392
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why also blanking out the "AMD Radeon HD _ _ _ _ Series Graphic" and the "please note the naming scheme for the HD 6_ _ _ Series GPUs"?
    Should'it be simply 6000? Or maybe there is more to hide?

    For the codename..
    I think the top one is unknown.. or it's Ant for Antilles.
    The others can be Bart/Cayman or Bart/Caicos
     
    #2638 MarkoIt, Oct 6, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 6, 2010
  19. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    The top one could fit BARTS under it, IMO
     
  20. UniversalTruth

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,747
    Likes Received:
    22
    Simply because he is in misinforming mood or lying. Yes, I said a lie. :lol:
    Those who support that weird idea, pls explain to all of us, what will 6700 series be? Please.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...