AMD confirms R680 is two chips on one board

As usual, super in 3dmark and roller coaster performance in games, COD4 the only not out of the date (2-3 years old) game where the card clearly ahead of the ultra, this is not enough for a win.

And what is Unreal Tournament 3?

Imo it's not that big of a rollercoaster though. I've seen worse.
 
And what is Unreal Tournament 3?

I miss that, there is good too.

Imo it's not that big of a rollercoaster though. I've seen worse.

At 1900x1200 in Unreal3 24% faster than the 8800ultra, in NFS Pro Street 41% slower than the 8800ultra, than whats this when not a rollercoaster?
I see worst than this too but this dual gpu solutions still waste of time and won't change anytime soon.
ATi has no other choice this time just come with dual GPU card, but NV follow this suite its a dissapointment, but they can do this because lack of real competation.
 
Those Crysis numbers are whacked in that review, crossfired 3870s do a hell of a lot better than that with the 8.1 hotfix & latest Crysis patch. Methinks beta drivers are showing their betaness there.
 
Those Crysis numbers are whacked in that review, crossfired 3870s do a hell of a lot better than that with the 8.1 hotfix & latest Crysis patch. Methinks beta drivers are showing their betaness there.

They can do better than that without the hotfix driver (and hell, without the patch too); I'd agree that they're not quite right.
 
I miss that, there is good too.



At 1900x1200 in Unreal3 24% faster than the 8800ultra, in NFS Pro Street 41% slower than the 8800ultra, than whats this when not a rollercoaster?

Thos NFS numbers look like a driver problem. Without AA the X2 beats the Ultra by a healthy margin. That should translate to a healthy margin with AA/AF too.

I see worst than this too but this dual gpu solutions still waste of time and won't change anytime soon.
ATi has no other choice this time just come with dual GPU card, but NV follow this suite its a dissapointment, but they can do this because lack of real competation.

A dual solution buys the IHV some extra time to get the next gen ready in time. NV did it too with the GF7950GX2. And it's probably also cheaper too to just smack two GPUs together at this point in time.
 
Thos NFS numbers look like a driver problem. Without AA the X2 beats the Ultra by a healthy margin. That should translate to a healthy margin with AA/AF too.
Random speculation on my part, but couldn't it simply get out of memory? After all, it *is* 512MiB vs 768MiB...

Besides that, pretty nice scores overall, IMO. Could be better, could be worse, but it's certainly about what you'd expect. Those complaining about scalability should realize that it's a quite attractive solution compared to the alternatives. I'm still not a big fan of AFR myself (latency...) but I know most people won't care as much, and good for them if they feel that way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm looking forward AMD celebration of come-back in enthusing market and dethroning G80Ultra. Speaking of G80Ultra; Nvidia made superb card but it will rob your wallet for such high price tag.

Celebrate? no reason, finally with 2 GPU they can beat the 14 months ago launched GPU based highend card, and this card competation (GX2) not arrived yet, not far away.
449$ looks good only now because ultra cost much more, but i'm not sure its look good in mid february too.

They expect the next driver iteration to boost performance considerably

There is still someone who belive this? :smile:
Just check out when was the last time any ATi driver made significant performance boost in anything, this is really a dream on category, always this coming when the card not shine so good than rumors suggested before. (of course i not say its can't happen, but hard to belive looking what happend in the last 2+ years).

Same things happening always until first rumors ("GPU is ATi next R300") to day1 ("next driver boost the performance to sky highs") , really bored :cry:
 
ASUS card, clocks 825/1800 (card use 0.83ns GDD3 memory rated for 2400mhz):
EAH3870X2_1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm also liking Asus' use of the 0.8ns memory so we can get some decent overclock out of it.
 
Celebrate? no reason, finally with 2 GPU they can beat the 14 months ago launched GPU based highend card, and this card competation (GX2) not arrived yet, not far away.
449$ looks good only now because ultra cost much more, but i'm not sure its look good in mid february too.

I see the 3870x2 in the same way I see the 8800 GT. 8800GT didn't completely demolish every other GPU, but it gave us similar performance to the $500+ 8800 GTX for $200 less. How can you not be excited that a $449 GPU can take the top spot from a $659 GPU (lowest price I can find for an 8800 Ultra on newegg)?

Besides, it's also great to see that ATI managed to make dual GPUs scale so well. (see http://en.expreview.com/?p=53 for a comparison of 3870 crossfire vs. 8800GT SLI). If they can deliver top performance at a good price, then why does it matter if it's one chip or two?

There is still someone who belive this? :smile:

I have to agree with you there. Almost every time people have said "Oh yeah? Just wait till we get better drivers for this card!" it ended with disappointment. However, maybe we'll get lucky and see some decent performance improvements, considering that the 3870x2 depends on drivers for its performance to an even greater extent than other GPUs.
 
I'll counter this:
There is still someone who belive this? :)
Yeah -- because we're dealing with crossfire. I've seen a game go from no crossfire support (framerate is less than a single card) to all the sudden getting crossfire support (framerate is now 50% more than a single card). That's a pretty substantial framerate increase for a single driver, and it's entirely possible for any game that doesn't currently support CF (there's quite a few)

This exactly scenario is entirely possible with the X2 card, for the obvious reason that it's nothing more than crossfire-on-a-stick. The good news is, such a driver would also help us poor people with a lowly pair of individual 3870's in crossfire too :D
 
Celebrate? no reason, finally with 2 GPU they can beat the 14 months ago launched GPU based highend card, and this card competation (GX2) not arrived yet, not far away.
449$ looks good only now because ultra cost much more, but i'm not sure its look good in mid february too.



There is still someone who belive this? :smile:
Just check out when was the last time any ATi driver made significant performance boost in anything, this is really a dream on category, always this coming when the card not shine so good than rumors suggested before. (of course i not say its can't happen, but hard to belive looking what happend in the last 2+ years).

Same things happening always until first rumors ("GPU is ATi next R300") to day1 ("next driver boost the performance to sky highs") , really bored :cry:

When was the last time AMD beat a competing corrosponding Nvidia product to market? That is exactly what they have done, because Nvidia's 9800GX2 or whatever is nowhere to be found. Sure, it'll be out in a month or two. It's not out now, AMD's is. It also means AMD can claim the fastest single card on the planet Dont even bother pointing out it's technically two, doesn't matter)..how long since that has been the case?

As far as performance I dont doubt Nvidia will retake the lead with their GX2, since their single card solution is faster. Who doesn't see that? You post enough here to know better. You knew exactly what was coming, spare the act please..

AMD is working with a pretty gimped architecture base, lately they have been doing a pretty good job of turning those lemons into lemonade, now, if they dont fix some of the ridiculous problems like lack of texture next go round, then I would say unleash the (further) criticism...
 
You'd hope that, with the new chips being released which support the "Hybrid Crossfire" thingy, ATI/AMD will be putting plenty of resources into making sure Crossfire works as advertised. If this means having staff dedicated to releasing 'hotfixes' for games within just a few days of release, then that's fine as far as I can see.
 
It's entirely possible that a 3870X2 could hold it's own against a 9800GX2, only because benchmarks with both SLI'd 8800 and CF'd 3870's show that CF setups generally scale better. That's not to say that the 3870X2 will dominate or even win, but I'd wager there is at least a small chance that the two will tie...
 
Back
Top