One of those two piece of software ignites emotion, the other does not.
TLOU made me sad, Sorcerer made me laugh. They both did their job well.
One of those two piece of software ignites emotion, the other does not.
I believe the reason why it looks wrong is because her facial anatomy is too perfect. It almost looks like a combination between a real face and an anime face. Another is the fact that it is a female model. Getting a female face to convey realism and believability is for some peculiar reason harder than with male faces. We discussed this before. It is harder to get facial expressions to look perfect for these reasons. I also dont think the aim of the demo was to convey higher quality of expressions achieved by this technology compared to the last. But rather the level of detailYeah, the facial animation while crying still just look wrong and bad.
On the other hand, give similar computing resources to a good western developer and the results would look imo substantially better.
Actually, true - I did laugh at the sorcerer! But I laughed all the way through Maniac Mansion and Day of the Tentacle that's basically pixel art.TLOU made me sad, Sorcerer made me laugh. They both did their job well.
I think the problem is that boys don't get girls full stop. So you see a girl's facial expression and you're like, wtf is she thinking? This is carried over to CGI faces too.
Ok we're in controversial statements territory here. First with the western developers being better, to girls' faces.
Human models look vastly improved from KZ SF, I guess the improved lighting, much higher polycount and better shaders contributed most.