bkilian,
Is there a reason why Microsoft isn't addressing the complaint that they have punished consumers who were not pirating games but only added a larger HDD?
Seems like a pretty blatant attempt to hide behind the TOS, paint everyone as a villan well knowing this isn't the case, and to safeguard the "Apple-Tax" MS-only peripherals.
You would think this was good for MS. Not only is MS charging for online gaming access for non-dedicated servers, when consumers up their HDD to buy MS products off of Live MS wins. Even if you argue, "They can re-download content" that costs MS money.
I feel for MS--to a degree. I remember a number of years ago getting into TeamSpeak with my BF clan and we were scrimming another clan where almost every member had a modded Xbox1 and dozens of pirated games. I am firmly against piracy and have been pretty firm on these forums against all those who take it as a relative issue and defend PC piracy.
On the other hand a company like MS can burn through goodwill pretty quickly and gain the impression they are a nickle-and-diming customers once they get them locked into their platform. I know MS will claim, "We only give customers what they have asked for" but this isn't true when you see how customers are asking for stripped features to return (look at Forza 3) or how this trend of extracting $60 at retail and then REQUIRING microtransactions to get the full benefit of the game (NHL and all those games that have DLC on the disc!!)
When MS starts nailing people for buying 3rd party controllers, 3rd party memory cards (cheaper+more space), or upgrading their HDD to either buy more MS content (or install games so your freaking loud system is tolerable) and decide when the 2005 "Customization and Personalization" of the Xbox was restrained ONLY to approved cash cows, well, MS looks chincy.
Then again who in the gaming press with a large reach dare speak such words? So MS is probably safe and need not really address this issue.