D
Looks like you could get a different queue ID if you just opened the store page with a new browser.
This will be even easier for bots and VMs now.
I don't get why they (the entire industry) doesn't simply implement a signup list where unique buyers are put into a very long queue. Where buyers are determined to be unique based on delivery address and credit card or some other meaningful metrics.
Well people wished for a queue system, they gave us a queue system. The problem is that a monkey's paw is granting the wishes.How did any of this get past even beginner level analysis?
I don't get why they (the entire industry) doesn't simply implement a signup list where unique buyers are put into a very long queue. Where buyers are determined to be unique based on delivery address and credit card or some other meaningful metrics.
That's for a Nvidia card, right? EVGA doesn't make Radeon graphics cards.This is exactly what EVGA did. I joined the queue in November and I'm still waiting.
With AirBNBs the delivery address is abused by these bot scalpers, in the same way they're used by general scammers. They give a street address of a bnb and because they know roughly the couple of hour window when they'll be delivered, they wait at the door of the house and sign for the package. You have people that literally their only job during the day is to drive to various airbnb's to collect packages for a small fee and deliver them to a central location.Where buyers are determined to be unique based on delivery address and credit card or some other meaningful metrics.
With AirBNBs the delivery address is abused by these bot scalpers, in the same way they're used by general scammers. They give a street address of a bnb and because they know roughly the couple of hour window when they'll be delivered, they wait at the door of the house and sign for the package. You have people that literally their only job during the day is to drive to various airbnb's to collect packages for a small fee and deliver them to a central location.
That's for a Nvidia card, right? EVGA doesn't make Radeon graphics cards.
Do you have a link to proof that AMD are selling gpu's to oem's at higher than the retail price of a graphics card?they do so by selling their chips to the OEMs at a much higher price.
RX 6600 XT is officially announced an no one cared/noticed?
Radeon RX 6600 XT (AIB-only launch)
https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
- MSRP 379 US-$, available from august 11th
- RDNA2: Navi23 (full spec, 32 CUs, 2048 FP32-FMA-ALUs)
- Game-Clock 2359 MHz
- 9,67 FP32-TFlops
- 8 GByte GDDR6, 128 Bit, 256 GByte/s (no other sizes allowed at launch)
- 32 MByte ∞$ @ 512 Byte/clk, up to 1.94 GHz (~993 GByte/s) while boosting
- 64 ROPs
- 160 Watt TBP
32 MByte ∞$ @ 512 Byte/clk, up to 1.94 GHz (~993 GByte/s) while boosting.
Yes, I have undeniable proof right here.Do you have a link to proof that AMD are selling gpu's to oem's at higher than the retail price of a graphics card?
IMO the problem here is that AMD doesn't get a 350% YoY increase in net income by selling us their GPUs at MSRP, they do so by selling their chips to the OEMs at a much higher price.
The chip shortage suuuuuucks. A year ago this might've been $299 and a good deal for the right audience. Now you'd be lucky to get it at "MSRP", whatever that means these days.
Does anyone know how the 512 bytes/clk is actually delivered? Is it servicing 4 independent 128 byte requests from a single L2, multiple L2’s? Are there multiple cache segments covering different parts of the address space. How many ports per segment etc.
The cache is split into independent slices, each of which has a single R/W port and is backed by it's own memory channel, and can serve a 128-byte line from the cache over 2 cycles.
32MB, 512 bytes/clk and 128bit interface then implies 8 4MB slices, each backed by a 16-bit gddr6 channel. The address space is probably interleaved over the slices by cache lines, but I haven't seen that written down anywhere, and haven't checked that. Also, the cache has a relatively high latency, but can support enough simultaneous accesses to provide full throughput, regardless of R/W mix.
Seems like it wont be usefully faster than a 5700xt which was available at the same price 2 years ago.RX 6600 XT is officially announced an no one cared/noticed?
Radeon RX 6600 XT (AIB-only launch)
https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
- MSRP 379 US-$, available from august 11th
- RDNA2: Navi23 (full spec, 32 CUs, 2048 FP32-FMA-ALUs)
- Game-Clock 2359 MHz
- 9,67 FP32-TFlops
- 8 GByte GDDR6, 128 Bit, 256 GByte/s (no other sizes allowed at launch)
- 32 MByte ∞$ @ 512 Byte/clk, up to 1.94 GHz (~993 GByte/s) while boosting
- 64 ROPs
- 160 Watt TBP
Sadly they only had couple games to compare to 5600XT & 5700, but based on those it should beat 5700 XT with clear margin (without checking I think they said 40 % faster in 3 and 70 % faster in one game compared to 5600 XT and according to TPUs results 5700 XT is only ~25% faster than 5600 XT at 1080pSeems like it wont be usefully faster than a 5700xt which was available at the same price 2 years ago.
Seems like it wont be usefully faster than a 5700xt which was available at the same price 2 years ago.