D
Playstation 5 [PS5] [Release November 12 2020]
- Thread starter BRiT
- Start date
Specs:
Lower GPU than XB1X. Custom audio hardware is in (equivalent to all 8 Jag cores in PS4). RT hardware is AMD's. Hardware compression, proprietary drive @800 GB, upgradeable internal storage (NVMe when its fast enough) for expansion and support for external HDDs for PS4 titles (probably also swap games into SSD?)
Lower GPU than XB1X. Custom audio hardware is in (equivalent to all 8 Jag cores in PS4). RT hardware is AMD's. Hardware compression, proprietary drive @800 GB, upgradeable internal storage (NVMe when its fast enough) for expansion and support for external HDDs for PS4 titles (probably also swap games into SSD?)
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/...s-and-tech-that-deliver-sonys-next-gen-vision
36 CUs at 2.23GHz.
Wow.
36 CUs at 2.23GHz.
Wow.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
DF's have the stats. Exactly as credible folks predictable. Under XSX on GPU/bandwidth, faster I/O. Shockingly reliable credible leakers.
"Variable frequency" GPU
That can't possibly go wrong.
"Variable frequency" GPU
That can't possibly go wrong.Boost clock. I bet the native clock is 2.0
DavidGraham
Veteran
Boost clocks sounds exactly like this: a cheap way of covering up the underlying defeciency in compute power.
The github leak was accurate all along.
The github leak was accurate all along.
thanks but needs a log in
Or variable to keep the TFS up
AbsoluteBeginner
Regular
Who would have thought AMD internal testing leak which was right on every other chip that was tested there (Renoir, MI100, Arden, Navi 10) will be correct on PS5.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
"Boot the game in a second". Did he just say that? A second!?!?!
Pretty proud of my guesses. Even my 2.2 ruminating turned out sort of correct, although I didnt commit to it.
The entire Cerny speech just got rendered relatively useless by Eurogamer leak LOL. Not listening to him drone on...
I think Xbox pretty convincingly won this. Heck if they want to rub it in they can up their own clocks too as they are running 400 mhz under Sony. That CU count difference is big.
That said on the flip side, the difference is much smaller than PS4>Xbox One last gen, it'll be ok. MS can easily screw this up with Lockhart, too.
What last gen showed is that the BASE console matters the most, with Ps4>One, and One X didn't matter. If Ms makes Lockhart the base, they will squander the advantage. People will go to a higher base in PS5 IMO.
The entire Cerny speech just got rendered relatively useless by Eurogamer leak LOL. Not listening to him drone on...
I think Xbox pretty convincingly won this. Heck if they want to rub it in they can up their own clocks too as they are running 400 mhz under Sony. That CU count difference is big.
That said on the flip side, the difference is much smaller than PS4>Xbox One last gen, it'll be ok. MS can easily screw this up with Lockhart, too.
What last gen showed is that the BASE console matters the most, with Ps4>One, and One X didn't matter. If Ms makes Lockhart the base, they will squander the advantage. People will go to a higher base in PS5 IMO.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
Why would you bet against the info given by the very article that provided the original data?
(edited quoted post)
Last edited by a moderator:
D
Deleted member 7537
Guest
NVME Compatible?
Because the very article mentions how Cerny specifically mentions that it won't be running that high all the time?
The 2.23 is the max, boost clock.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Deleted member 7537
- Games Industry
- Sticky