Microsoft acquired Activision Blizzard King for $69 Billion on 2023-10-13

We are at a point where even sega and nokia signed a deal for the dreamcast and the ngage, but not sony.
It will never happen, but technically the only platform where the next cod can not ship is ps5, for sony's decision.

:unsure:
 
We are at a point where even sega and nokia signed a deal for the dreamcast and the ngage, but not sony.
It will never happen, but technically the only platform where the next cod can not ship is ps5, for sony's decision.

:unsure:

I mean if you are in MS's shoes you either have sony sign the contract and you get a bunch of revenue from the ps5 copy or they don't sign the contract and you get cod as close as an exclusive as possible.

I think they would be fine with it either way.
 
Microsoft is no 'safer' to work for than Activision.

MS has consistently been rated one of the best companies at which to work.

<Edit> in Forbes most recent list. MS ranks 8th, Google 11th, Sony was 40th. Atvi did not crack the top 50. The list was made by surveying employees if they would recommend their workplace to others.
 
Last edited:
MS has consistently been rated one of the best companies at which to work.

<Edit> in Forbes most recent list. MS ranks 8th, Google 11th, Sony was 40th. Atvi did not crack the top 50. The list was made by surveying employees if they would recommend their workplace to others.
Liking their job is not the same thing as determining job security. I have no doubt plenty of Activision devs greatly dislike all being piled onto make Call of Duty games, but it absolutely is a safe and well paying job to have. And Microsoft is not going to do anything to change this situation, either. The whole reason they are buying Activision is because they do make a ton of money on regular Call of Duty releases and whatnot.
 
MS has consistently been rated one of the best companies at which to work.

<Edit> in Forbes most recent list. MS ranks 8th, Google 11th, Sony was 40th. Atvi did not crack the top 50. The list was made by surveying employees if they would recommend their workplace to others.

Were they citing another source? Because Forbes isn't really a news organization, they just let columnists write opinions.
 
Were they citing another source? Because Forbes isn't really a news organization, they just let columnists write opinions.

Forbes partnered with the market research firm Statista to compile our list of America’s Best Large Employers. The ranking is based on a survey of about 45,000 workers at American companies and institutions with 5,000 or more employees. Participants were asked if they would recommend their current employers to friends and family (on a scale of 0 to 10), and to cite any other employer they would also recommend. The final list ranks the 500 large employers that received the most recommendations.

It was from Feb 2023.
 
Just as I figured would happen, thanks to the MS Activision deal it will likely lead to more consolidation with regard to the game industry.

Take-Two, Electronic Arts, Roblox, Ubisoft could be targets after Activision deal

Take-Two Interactive (NASDAQ:TTWO), Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA), Roblox (NYSE:RBLX), and Ubisoft (OTCPK:UBSFY) could be potential takeover targets, Benchmark analyst Mike Hickey wrote in a note on Wednesday.

Potential buyers of the videogame makers include Amazon (AMZN), Tencent (OTCPK:TCEHY), Google (GOOGL), Netflix (NFLX), and Sony (SONY), according to Benchmark's Hickey.

"We believe the decision is a major victory for MSFT and should provide a path for them to complete the proposed deal," Hickey wrote. "We believe that MSFT’s successful acquisition of ATVI could provide a catalyst for further industry consolidation in the video game industry."
 
No-one was talking about job security. It was the improvements in working conditions and "T&Cs of employment" that is why ABK employees will be in favour of this deal. I don't know why you thought it was about 'Job security'?
But why would any of that really change? They're still gonna be under the exact same management, direction and structure.

And the comment I originally responded to was indeed talking about job security, which is where this came from.
 
But why would any of that really change? They're still gonna be under the exact same management, direction and structure.

And the comment I originally responded to was indeed talking about job security, which is where this came from.

You should re-read my comment. It wasn't about job security, if it was I wouldn't have mentioned the MS acquisition announcement as stopping a mass exodus of developer talent from ABK. Developers were stating their intentions to leave ABK for other employers due to all that was happening at ABK (fear of losing their jobs wasn't even a consideration). That stopped almost immediately after the announcement of the acquisition because working conditions for MS employees as well as management policies are considered to be considerably better than what exists at ABK.

Regards,
SB
 
Last edited:
Well those poor developers are in for a rude awakening when they discover that Microsoft has no plans on changing general Activision management or generally getting into any more detailed management of the company.
 
People are acting like what has happened with the ABK merger is something new. MS and Sony and Nintendo have been able to do this for the entire history of their respective corporations.

Large acquisitions like this happen all the time. This just happens to be the largest in modern video game history.

Has the food industry imploded? Are vehicles so much worse now than they were 100 years ago when there were far more car manufacturers? Has one car manufacturer acquired all other smaller car manufacturers? Is there only one remaining dominant tech corporation because they've acquired all of the others?

Before people continue to freak out, remember the one key thing. An acquisition generally requires someone wanting or needing (for example, shareholders forcing the sale of a company) to be acquired in order for an acquisition to happen. While hostile takeovers are possible, they are exceedingly rare and difficult to pull off.

And, generally speaking, a video game company or publisher is usually only going to want to be sold if that company or publisher thinks that there is a high likelihood that they may cease operations or their ability to compete in the market will so seriously decline that the value of their company would be significantly lower in the next few years.

IE - Internally those companies believe that either the end of their company is near or that there is a great risk that they'll be facing bankruptcy if even one title in development fails to perform well in the market.

So, if you're going to start panicking about the sky falling down, first go and determine which publishers/developers are in imminent danger of failing or going bankrupt and those are the companies that are most likely to be acquired. If the developer or publisher is doing fine, then it's incredibly unlikely that they'll want to be acquired by another company.

Regards,
SB
 
Well those poor developers are in for a rude awakening when they discover that Microsoft has no plans on changing general Activision management or generally getting into any more detailed management of the company.

I'd be exceedingly surprised if MS allows the behavior that was tolerated at ABK to continue under MS ownership. Anyone that remains and has a history of harassment and abuse of employees will likely either be let go or retained under probation with continued employment contingent on good behavior.

You don't get a reputation as a good workplace by current and former employees if you have a consistently toxic environment. To be clear, all companies have cases of harassment and abuse, it's how prevalent it is, how tolerated (or even encouraged) it is and how the company's HR responds to complaints that forms the basis of employee satisfaction.

And it's undeniable that people working for MS are far more likely to be happy with their employment environment and conditions than what existed at ABK or even the vast majority of tech companies period.

Regards,
SB
 
I'd be exceedingly surprised if MS allows the behavior that was tolerated at ABK to continue under MS ownership. Anyone that remains and has a history of harassment and abuse of employees will likely either be let go or retained under probation with continued employment contingent on good behavior.

You don't get a reputation as a good workplace by current and former employees if you have a consistently toxic environment. To be clear, all companies have cases of harassment and abuse, it's how prevalent it is, how tolerated (or even encouraged) it is and how the company's HR responds to complaints that forms the basis of employee satisfaction.

And it's undeniable that people working for MS are far more likely to be happy with their employment environment and conditions than what existed at ABK or even the vast majority of tech companies period.

Regards,
SB

The ABK staff will get a standard 2-3 year transition period and then MS will bring in their own people to keep the shop running. That is how it typically is with purchases. Bobby will be gone quickly because its an easy pr win and an easy way to show that MS is different than ABK's scandal plagued elite
 
Back
Top