Anyone seen this confirmed elsewhere?
Current Generation Games Analysis Technical Discussion [2023] [XBSX|S, PS5, PC]
- Thread starter BRiT
- Start date
- Status
Anyone seen this confirmed elsewhere?
This has been around for years now.
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
Considering one of the game's problems is it can't fully utilize the CPU, not sure attributing this to 'driver overhead' by this title alone is wise.
It’s been a trend for a few years now in DX12 games. When CPU limited, AMD is often 10-30% faster.
PS5 and XSX offer 2 display modes, XSS one.
- Quality mode increases the maximum resolution to 2160p with temporal reconstruction from approximately 1440p. Performance mode limits the resolution to 1440p from 1080p-972p. Average resolution is slightly higher in XSX.
- Performance mode cuts beyond resolution, affecting textures, geometry, draw distance or vegetation.
- On PS5 and XSX we have Ray-Tracing applied on some reflections and ambient occlusion. RT cannot be disabled and is applied in both graphics modes.
- XSS lacks Ray-Tracing and suffers cuts in several settings. Shadows, texturing, geometry, vegetation, reflections or post-processing, but the most remarkable is the global illumination.
- The global illumination in XSS is simpler, which causes significant differences in several areas with respect to the other versions.
- All versions have an adjustable FOV. - Loading times are faster on PC, followed by PS5.
- In terms of performance, PS5/XSX and XSS quality mode suffer from some stuttering issues in certain areas (as was the case in the first game). In performance mode, PS5 has a more stable framerate compared to XSX, but the drops in certain stage loads are more pronounced on Sony's platform.
- I have decided not to show various graphs on PC performance because I consider the game to be broken on this platform. Numerous performance glitches and lack of optimization force me to temporarily advise against this version, with drops below 50fps using an RTX 4080 with FSR.
- It's a shame to see how Respawn can't seem to get UE4 properly optimized for their game. It really contrasts to see such a fun game, with such a high budget, and such an improved performance. Hopefully their third installment will take better advantage of the hardware with UE5.
Wow El analista Debits got the resolutions completely wrong The internal res is FAR lower
The write up says the performance mode is reconstructed from between 972p and 1080p up to 1440p. Is the internal res actually even lower?
Is does look shockingly bad at times in performance mode with loads of aliasing and shimmering and has loads of what I assume are FSR artifacts when you move the camera.
Yeah, it can’t be far lower than 972-1080p lol.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
I want this at 4,000fps.
40 years on, those janky dragons from the Atari 2600 game Adventure still freak me out. I just need to be freaked out faster and more consistently.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
Games generally, not just PC. For many years I have not pre-ordered a gameprior to launch unless I have I seen the launch performance on the platform I intend to play on.
In this scenario, pre-order may mean pre-ordering something 12-24 hours ahead of release. I absolutely not will buy something unseen in performance terms.
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor Benchmark Test & Performance Analysis Review
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor is EA's new AAA title from the epic franchise. In our performance review, we're taking a closer look at image quality, VRAM usage, and performance on a selection of modern graphics cards, with ray tracing enabled and disabled.
I’ve seen that same orange glow in other games where HDR tone mapping isn’t working properly.
- Status
Similar threads
