Dominik D
Regular
Excluding Nintendo is fallacious. But even if you let yourself do that, it doesn't explain how Valve destroyed MS in a market in which MS does not participate in - which is what I responded to. You shifted discussion to what success is (why?) and how Nintendo is in a different league.I think I addressed most of your points here in the parts of my comment you ignored.
If the claim is that MS should have some mobile offering then, yeah, maybe. But not only is it a different discussion altogether, this claim only makes sense if you exclude Surface which sells $billions worth of products every year. I stand by what I said: you're shifting discussion from what I responded to onto something that can be defended (but it's not what I argued against). So no, you didn't address the core of the issue in the part of the comment I ignored because it didn't address what I was responding to.