Tahir2 said:Why are wafers round and not rectangular? Surely being retangular is more of an optimal layout.
The raw silicon itself is not a very large part of the cost. All the other steps work well with a round wafer, especially spinning photoresist. You can use round equipment that will likely have better uniformity characteristics especially for airflow.Alstrong said:What do they do with all the unusable chips?
I'm sure they are in the Battlestar Galactica universe.nelg said:I would like to know why chips aren't octagonal.
Mintmaster said:The raw silicon itself is not a very large part of the cost....
No, of course not, as all kinds of impurities have been added (intentionally) during chip manufacturing. That would contaminate the silicon raw material.geo said:Do you get to toss the excess back into the pot and melt it into the next pulled goop?
Did you mean hexagonal?nelg said:I would like to know why chips aren't octagonal.
Simon F said:Did you mean hexagonal?
Then to answer your question, if they were hexagonal then imagine trying to cut apart the separate dice. With rectangular dice, you can cut (snap?) in nice straight lines right across the wafer.nelg said:
Simon F said:Then to answer your question, if they were hexagonal then imagine trying to cut apart the separate dice. With rectangular dice, you can cut (snap?) in nice straight lines right across the wafer.