Which slide was that?I was just going by the AMD slide....
Which slide was that?I was just going by the AMD slide....
Apparently one stating (falsely? ) that the HD 4670 is going to be priced at 120$.Which slide was that?
Maybe Nvidia was not counting in US-Dollars anymore?This was an NV slide.
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/7703/12200032927678265308wn7.jpg
But it seems like CJ said, that there >$100 hope will not full-filled.
Apparently one stating (falsely? ) that the HD 4670 is going to be priced at 120$.
Indeed, that slide was not, as far as I'm aware, anything to do with us. And it seems, if it was an NVIDIA slide, there has been some hasty tweaking of what's lined up in their stack even since then!This was an NV slide.
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/7703/12200032927678265308wn7.jpg
Well, that's the question -- what is it? =) I was told (basically by NV) that this is GT200 but it certainly doesn't look like it. And i have my doubts about this being GT200b or GT206 or something else.22*22 = 484mm²
583 * 0.81 = 472mm²
Pretty much what you'd expect for a "nearly-straight-but-not-optical shrink" IMO, *if* that is what it is...
What are the reasons for your doubts?Well, that's the question -- what is it? =) I was told (basically by NV) that this is GT200 but it certainly doesn't look like it. And i have my doubts about this being GT200b or GT206 or something else.
It was a bit early for them to have non-working GT200b or GT206 samples.What are the reasons for your doubts?
With several 55nm versions of other GPUs coming within a couple of months of the 65nm versions, it seems NVidia's roadmap is in a bit of a state, so I'm not sure what can be concluded about timings.It was a bit early for them to have non-working GT200b or GT206 samples.
So, GT200b is still 512-bit?
Jawed