VR-Zone: G96, G94 and G92 @ 55nm

831041e8-ee91-4f8b-933d-7d68c50eeb28.jpg

55nm iGame 9600GT
 
121mm² is what you would expect a 10% (i.e. 21% in two dimensions) linear shrink of G96a to be, so yes, that's nearly certainly a 55nm chip. (sigh, it's still amazing to me how bad NV's G84->G96b's shrink is; 13x13->11x11 for a full-node improvement... I don't think G96b is at UMC, either, but I could be wrong)
 
You want to see something amazing? =)
That's supposedly GT200 die...

o794c8.jpg


o5nsbt.jpg


...But it doesn't look like GT200 die and it's size is much smaller (G80 die is different too although the size is more or less comparable).
Any ideas what this is?
 
22*22 = 484mm²
583 * 0.81 = 472mm²
Pretty much what you'd expect for a "nearly-straight-but-not-optical shrink" IMO, *if* that is what it is... :)
 
22*22 = 484mm²
583 * 0.81 = 472mm²
Pretty much what you'd expect for a "nearly-straight-but-not-optical shrink" IMO, *if* that is what it is... :)
Well, that's the question -- what is it? =) I was told (basically by NV) that this is GT200 but it certainly doesn't look like it. And i have my doubts about this being GT200b or GT206 or something else.
 
Well, that's the question -- what is it? =) I was told (basically by NV) that this is GT200 but it certainly doesn't look like it. And i have my doubts about this being GT200b or GT206 or something else.
What are the reasons for your doubts?

Jawed
 
It was a bit early for them to have non-working GT200b or GT206 samples.
With several 55nm versions of other GPUs coming within a couple of months of the 65nm versions, it seems NVidia's roadmap is in a bit of a state, so I'm not sure what can be concluded about timings.

Also, at the last CC NVidia said that all GPUs in manufacturing are 55nm now. And it's almost a year since GT200 should have launched, so a 55nm version arriving shortly shouldn't be surprising.

Jawed
 
Back
Top