Developer commentary on comparison:
The 360 version obviously has less nuanced lighting. You may say that the 360 version could be on a court lit for day while the PS3 version was night lighting, but a Sumo Digital producer who worked on the game said the following when I asked him which version he preferred graphically: "Take a look, which do you think is better? The PS3 version features soft shadows and anti-aliasing, so you get more natural lighting. The 360 version has darker shadows with less detail, so I prefer the more realistic look of the PS3."
Later on however, when asked the same question, another developer with Sumo Digital said that he believed the two versions were roughly equal but that the widescreen TV showing the 360 versions was having display issues. "We've been having problems with that set all week." It's worth noting that the first guy was a more senior lead producer, however (the second guy told me that if I wanted to know more, "he's the guy to ask.")
anyway, i'v read at a few places that quite a few ps3 titles have AA on them while the same games on xbox360 doesnt have them. is this because of taking acount of Edram takes more time or something like that?