30 fps. This has been confirmed by Mark Rein.
Unreal Tournament III Discussion *renamed*
- Thread starter BoardBonobo
- Start date
30 fps. This has been confirmed by Mark Rein.
djskribbles
Legend
again, that video is no indication of what the ps3 version looks like, i dunno whats wrong with that video... it almost looks like it was taken off-screen with a low res camera with the brightness set extremely low and upscaled to 720p. look at other videos on GT and you'll see. also, the jaggies are not that bad. most of the footage shown of UT3 has been on the PS3.
this video in particular looks great. http://www.gametrailers.com/player/24261.html
this video in particular looks great. http://www.gametrailers.com/player/24261.html
AFAIK
Per pass, like all GeForce7 GPUs. More passes means more AA per frame, though NV generally stopped at 4xMSAA with single GPUs up to that gen. Isn't Resistance 4xAA?
Resistance is 4xAA. Formula 1 is 4xAA
Locked I might add. They say it's running above 30fps at the moment, around 40fps, but that they have decided to lock it (or that's the plan for the moment.)
Locked doesn't always mean "stable". Locked a lot of times, at least used to mean, they would cap the framerate. So a game that averaged 40-50fps (with a few small dips below 30 and peaks above 60) they would "cap" or "lock" the game at 30fps instead of having a lot of tearing and slowdown to 30fps and peaks to 60fps.
I do believe Epic will hit a stable 30fps though as the game really needs it.
I do believe Epic will hit a stable 30fps though as the game really needs it.
Yup that's what I meant (said) - they are above 30fps, but they are going to "lock" it ("cap it") at 30fps.
No, it can do 4xAA.
cloudscapes
Regular
the trailer posted earlier has bad gamma. you can also tell this by looking at the concept art that was flashed for a few seconds.
for sure the PS3 (and 360) version underwent graphical optimizations to be able to fit it in <512 memory compared to the PC version, but I'd wait till a better PS3 trailer comes out to make any real judgments. the capture here is really bad, though I'm sure on an actual TV screen it'll look fine.
for sure the PS3 (and 360) version underwent graphical optimizations to be able to fit it in <512 memory compared to the PC version, but I'd wait till a better PS3 trailer comes out to make any real judgments. the capture here is really bad, though I'm sure on an actual TV screen it'll look fine.
Even the PC version won't look like the uber-supersampled bullshots. Those images were rendered at 3K resolution with as high AA/AF settings as possible, before resized to 720p. They show off how incredible the artwork in the game is - but no computer would be able to run it at those settings... most people's PCs couldn't even reach the console's quality.
It's an urban legend.
IIRC mmmkay found a screenshot with 2xQAA.
No idea about F1.
Some of Mmmkay's finding have been found inaccurate.
Care to elaborate? 
Keep in mind that QAA is sometimes described as being "like 4xMSAA at the cost of 2x, but with blurring".
I get the feeling that this is a game that will age fairly well as people gradually migrate towards decent D3D10 and multi-cpu systems. That said, I wonder just how scalable they made the game for those lower end systems. Is it supposed to support SM2.0 cards even?
Keep in mind that QAA is sometimes described as being "like 4xMSAA at the cost of 2x, but with blurring".
Laa-Yosh said:
I get the feeling that this is a game that will age fairly well as people gradually migrate towards decent D3D10 and multi-cpu systems. That said, I wonder just how scalable they made the game for those lower end systems. Is it supposed to support SM2.0 cards even?
I have seen the shot. Unless you think that ss does not represent actual engine, ...
iceberg187
Regular
Ouch (though not that implausible, must be hard memory-restrictions on PS3). And looking further its likely that big mods will have to be cut down (or simply not done) for PS3
Seems like my excuse for not upgrading my PC is gone
"Nerve-Damage"
Regular
