TSMC Execution [2024]

These are all just market rumours and speculation as usual. TSMC is ASML's biggest customer and has more than 50% of the global installed base of EUV machines. They always planned to take a high NA machine as early as possible for R&D purposes, they're just not buying in volume yet that's all. The timing and/or cost does not work for their current nodes up to A16. The next full node shrink, which is due in 2028 I think, may use high NA but TSMC haven't decided yet.
 
Which AI chips are on 3nm?
Well Nvidia is widely speculated to move to 3nm next year for Blackwell's evolution. This article is talking about the situation going forward, not just right now. Not saying it's a credible story, necessarily. Plausible, though.
 
Well Nvidia is widely speculated to move to 3nm next year for Blackwell's evolution. This article is talking about the situation going forward, not just right now. Not saying it's a credible story, necessarily. Plausible, though.
The article seems fairly plausible. Currently only Apple and Intel are ramping 3nm in volume, but by the end of this year/next year we will see multiple other product ramps including Apple's A18 SoC(s), M4 & derivatives ; AMD Turin Dense, Strix Halo, MI350; Qualcomm and Mediatek mobile SoCs, and perhaps a few others but it seems clear that TSMC's 3nm is in high demand. Nvidia has surely prebooked capacity for Rubin but it does have sufficient competition for capacity for the foreseeable future.
 
5nm should be getting price cuts in the near future as the equipment is nearly fully depreciated for the initial production lines at least (TSMC operates on a 5 year depreciation cycle and the equipment was installed towards end 2019). Once 3nm fully ramps next year, 5nm utilisation should also drop which would also be a factor. TSMC is also introducing a lower cost N4C process which should be a long life node like N6.

On 3nm getting price hikes, it's not surprising. HPC and AI demand is still strong. Though a large part of initial 3nm production was sold at lower prices years ago so it won't have much of an immediate impact.
 
According to media reports (via MyDrivers), Apple has postponed using TSMC's 2nm processor chips for the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, with the commercial launch now set for 2026. The delays come after concerns over the high production cost of the 2nm chips from TSMC and the limited manufacturing capacity. While the supplier has already begun trial production of the chips, the results are not promising and would potentially require time to deliver a finished product, according to reports.
 
TSMC's Q4 results:


Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C., January 16, 2025 -- TSMC today announced consolidated revenue of NT$868.46 billion, net income of NT$374.68 billion, and diluted earnings per share of NT$14.45 (US$2.24 per ADR unit) for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024.

Year-over-year, fourth quarter revenue increased 38.8% while net income and diluted EPS both increased 57.0%. Compared to third quarter 2024, fourth quarter results represented a 14.3% increase in revenue and a 15.2% increase in net income. All figures were prepared in accordance with TIFRS on a consolidated basis.

In US dollars, fourth quarter revenue was $26.88 billion, which increased 37.0% year-over-year and increased 14.4% from the previous quarter.

Gross margin for the quarter was 59.0%, operating margin was 49.0%, and net profit margin was 43.1%.

In the fourth quarter, shipments of 3-nanometer accounted for 26% of total wafer revenue; 5-nanometer accounted for 34%; 7-nanometer accounted for 14%. Advanced technologies, defined as 7-nanometer and more advanced technologies, accounted for 74% of total wafer revenue.
 
TSMC does not say anything about its customers but there were news reports indicating that customers of 3nm process include Apple, AMD, Intel, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm.
 
TSMC does not say anything about its customers but there were news reports indicating that customers of 3nm process include Apple, AMD, Intel, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm.

I don't think Nvidia is shipping 3nm in revenue at the moment. In order of revenue the likely candidates are Apple, Qualcomm/Intel, AMD and Mediatek.
 
I don't think Nvidia is shipping 3nm in revenue at the moment. In order of revenue the likely candidates are Apple, Qualcomm/Intel, AMD and Mediatek.
Yes, Apple is shipping iPhones, iPads and Macs with 3nm products.

Apple M3, M3 Pro, M3 Max, M4, M4 Pro, M4 Max, A17 Pro, A18 and A18 Pro.
 
President Trump is preparing to place tariffs beyond Chinese assembled electronics to computer chips made in Taiwan, warning the tariffs could reach as high as 100%.

“In particular, in the very near future, we’re going to be placing tariffs on foreign production of computer chips, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals to return production of these essential goods to the United States,” Trump said in a speech to Republicans on Monday.

I like the "return" part there, apparently TSMC left the US at some point in the past.
 
So the intent here is to strongarm TSMC into building more fab plants in the US, which will take many many years, all while Americans have to deal with significantly increased prices from the tariffs during that wait.

Genius.

And let's not forget that states will still compete for contracts with subsidized deals paid for by our tax dollars!
 
Last edited:
So the intent here is to strongarm TSMC into building more fab plants in the US, which will take many many years, all while Americans have to deal with significantly increased prices from the tariffs during that wait.

Genius.

And let's not forget that states will still compete for contracts with subsidized deals paid for by our tax dollars!

They already have some under construction and Arizona will start producing A16 for Apple and Zen 5 for AMD.

 
Even this is not entirely true. Intel neve really left the US, and keeps most of their best fabs in the US.

I think we're quibbling semantics here.

At one point high end chip manufacturing was basically Intel in terms of market share but the overall product landscape has changed.

Intel no longer represents the bulk of high end chip manufacturing as Intel chips themselves don't represent the bulk of high end chip sales and fabless companies don't use them. Fabless semi companies that have instead rose up (eg. Nvidia, AMD, Qualcomm, Apple) and now represent the vast majority of high end chip sales but they all use TSMC with some Samsung.

Regardless the objective is to either shift fabless companies to Intel and/or have TSMC and Samsung build more in the US that would lead to shifting manufacturing back to the US. Not here to critique either way how this would work in terms of the given strategy but I think it's kind of clear what the stated intent is here.
 
Back
Top