flippin_waffles
Newcomer
There seems to be something truly odd going on here.. !!!
Small PCB: RV630Pro
Large PCB: RV630XT VIVO (Rage Theater)
Or am I right?
The second board has a ES/Demonstrator written all over it. Namely, the bunched-up power regulators at a weired angle.
IIRC there are some cards out there with regulators or other components (besides the mem chips of course) in weird angles, though?
WHy is one board longer than the other? And why are they blocking the rage theater chip? Or is it the theater chip?
Given the way UVD has been mentioned in previously leaked slides -- as a feature inherent to the entire R6 line -- I would have thought it would have been more cost effective (especially for the volume parts such as RV610) to integrate the necessary logic into the main ASIC rather than add a separate chip to the PCB in the way that the Theatre 200 chip has been used in specific AIB SKUs for VIVO functionality over the last couple years?IIRC the RV630 doesn't have the RT200, just the R600 boards...and perhaps only the XT/XTX at that. The chip that's hidden, I believe, is the Xilleon-based UVD decoder chip.
IIRC the RV630 doesn't have the RT200, just the R600 boards...and perhaps only the XT/XTX at that. The chip that's hidden, I believe, is the Xilleon-based UVD decoder chip.
Anybody else look at the date on the picture? 2007/1/11. If ATI has had samples since Janurary, I'll be one pissed off fella if these cards are delayed.
Given the way UVD has been mentioned in previously leaked slides -- as a feature inherent to the entire R6 line -- I would have thought it would have been more cost effective (especially for the volume parts such as RV610) to integrate the necessary logic into the main ASIC rather than add a separate chip to the PCB in the way that the Theatre 200 chip has been used in specific AIB SKUs for VIVO functionality over the last couple years?
My understanding was that the R6xx, and RV630 would have the chip integrated and the RV610 would have the Theatre chip as a seperate chip.
US
According to the latest Fuad update, the HD2600XT is clocked at 800/1100. (35.2GB/sec)Interestingly, RV530 was deployed in two GPUs, X1600XT and Pro with bandwidth of 22.1 and 10.9GB/s. So, in a sense, there's a precedent for a 2:1 ratio in bandwidth based on the "pro" board. But X1600XT was blessed with considerably more bandwidth than was useful - X1650XT, with twice the ALUs, TMUs and ROPs is upto 75% faster (typically 35%) with slightly less bandwidth than X1600XT.
That score of 2105 in 3DMk06 SM3 test is pretty much the same as a stock 8600GTS, e.g. 2029:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/geforce8600gts_21.html
Jawed
Ehr? longer card from january? as posted above, the date on the photo was wrong, the guy didn't set the dat on his camera yet. Do not believe everything you see!considering the longer card is from January, could it be possible that they actually managed to pull it through with RV560 design later on?
Mao5 said:the guy who took these photos said that this's because he set up the wrong date in his dc.
Ehr? longer card from january? as posted above, the date on the photo was wrong, the guy didn't set the dat on his camera yet. Do not believe everything you see!
Oh, completely missed that
Given the way UVD has been mentioned in previously leaked slides -- as a feature inherent to the entire R6 line -- I would have thought it would have been more cost effective (especially for the volume parts such as RV610) to integrate the necessary logic into the main ASIC rather than add a separate chip to the PCB in the way that the Theatre 200 chip has been used in specific AIB SKUs for VIVO functionality over the last couple years?