TheChefO said:Isn't 12xdvd data transfer faster than 2xbr?
a 12x dvd is 12x at max ,and around 5 at min.When you stream ,you do it based on the lower speed.
TheChefO said:Isn't 12xdvd data transfer faster than 2xbr?
_phil_ said:a 12x dvd is 12x at max ,and around 5 at min.When you stream ,you do it based on the lower speed.
_phil_ said:a 12x dvd is 12x at max ,and around 5 at min.When you stream ,you do it based on the lower speed.
_phil_ said:BD is said 2x constant.
sonyps35 said:The real question though is which is straight up faster in say, an average gaming loading/streaming scenario, 12 DVD or 2X Blu-Ray. We understand the 12X DVD has greater peak speed, while Blu-Ray is said to have certain advantages to overcome this.
My bet is on the 12X DVD though. I'd like to see a real scientific comparison instead of innuendo though.
london-boy said:As has been explained lots of times, 12x DVD is faster than 2X Bluray, but the problem is that the DVD drive will only reach the full 12x speed in the outer tracks of the disc, whereas on Bluray that's constant when it needs to be, and variable when it needs to be.
Um, I'm not quite getting this. CLV slows down the disc speed towards the outer edge to match the transfer rate of the inside tracks. If your inside track can manage (pie in the sky figures) 20 MB/s @ 5000 RPM, in CLV you'd slow down the motor so you're reading 20 MB/s at maybe 2500 RPM on the outside, right? But then if you kept the 5000 RPM with CAV, you'd be getting 40 GB/s towards the outside edge. Thus when it comes to varying between CAV and CLV, CAV gives the same minimum transfer rate but higher maximum, no? At which point why bother slowing down the drive for CLV?london-boy said:As has been explained lots of times, 12x DVD is faster than 2X Bluray, but the problem is that the DVD drive will only reach the full 12x speed in the outer tracks of the disc, whereas on Bluray that's constant when it needs to be, and variable when it needs to be.
there...Shifty Geezer said:Um, I'm not quite getting this. CLV slows down the disc speed towards the outer edge to match the transfer rate of the inside tracks. If your inside track can manage (pie in the sky figures) 20 MB/s @ 5000 RPM, in CLV you'd slow down the motor so you're reading 20 MB/s at maybe 2500 RPM on the outside, right? But then if you kept the 5000 RPM with CAV, you'd be getting 40 GB/s towards the outside edge. Thus when it comes to varying between CAV and CLV, CAV gives the same minimum transfer rate but higher maximum, no? At which point why bother slowing down the drive for CLV?
Automatic CAV/CLV selection:
"Professional Disc for DATA" drives support both CAV (constant angular velocity) and CLV (constant linear velocity) transfer modes when reading and writing data. In CAV mode the disc rotates at a constant speed, meaning that the transfer rate slows as the pickup approaches the center of the disc, but seek operations are fast (110ms average). In CLV mode the speed of the pickup is constant, so although seek operations take longer, the maximum transfer rate of 11MB/s is maintained at all times. The drive firmware automatically selects the Optimum mode to ensure the best overall performance. For example, if accessing a series of relatively small text files, CAV is used for fast seek times, but when reading large music or video files, CLV is employed to ensure the maximum transfer rate. The factory setting ensures that the drive automatically selects the optimum transfer mode. But if necessary the user can select the transfer mode: DIP switches allow selection of either CAV or Optimum mode, while any one of the three modes (CAV, CLV or Optimum) can be specified by a mode select command.*
Muchas gracias. And I haven't got the terms mixed up. If I have, it's not me that's mixed up but the people who coined the termslondon-boy said:In the end it's all about seek times... Oh and i think you got CAV and CLV mixed up...
london-boy said:As has been explained lots of times, 12x DVD is faster than 2X Bluray, but the problem is that the DVD drive will only reach the full 12x speed in the outer tracks of the disc, whereas on Bluray that's constant when it needs to be, and variable when it needs to be.
Powderkeg said:You are sort of neglecting to mention that a 12X DVD MINIMUM speed is about the same as 2X Bluray constant, aren't you?
2X Bluray read speed = 8MBps
12X DVD read speed = 8.2-16.5 MBps
Powderkeg said:You are sort of neglecting to mention that a 12X DVD MINIMUM speed is about the same as 2X Bluray constant, aren't you?
2X Bluray read speed = 8MBps
12X DVD read speed = 8.2-16.5 MBps
scooby_dooby said:So anytime the BR drive is accessing a "series of relatively small text files" it actually runs in CAV mode just like 360's DVD drive, meaning read speeds lower than 2x?
Very interesting, so the BR drive is not infact a 2x CLV drive as many have argued, but alot of the time will in fact run in CAV mode with throughput considerably less than the peak 9MB/s.
Titanio said:Where are you getting that from?
If it's CLV, then it'd be a constant 9MB/s. If it's CAV, 9MB/s is either the peak or the minimum. I believe it's supposed to be CLV though.
scooby_dooby said:LB's quote. And I'm assuming 72mbps is the peak for a 2xBR drive, is it not?