people can debate the nit picky defenitions of slow development all day long. The Bottom line will ALWAYS be products to market.
I don't think anyone disagree's with you there, once again I was replying to someone who I assumed was blaming the lack of cards on slow design, so I asked him why he thought design was the problem.
The truth is Since the Neon 250 design IT has offered nothing even close to turning the heads of the majority of the community.
The truth is no'one has brought an IT design to the table that's turned the heads of the majority of the graphics card community. Your mistaking what STM or NEC bring out in hardware with what IT can design if required by someone like NEC or STM.. of course IT haven't brought anything to the table, thats not there business.
Had IT been able to launch the Neon 250 on time the entire Graphics market would look very different today
Once again I hate to have to keep making the distinction between IT and the company that actually makes the chip and decides on features, speed, cost, and market but I think its a important distinction, IT were not late with there design for Neon 250 and they didn't decide when to bring it to the PC market because it wasn't there product, it was simply based on there design.. NEC decided to make the Dreamcast a priority.
Instead the Emphasis was placed on SEGA. A deal that became fruitless in only 24 months.
I doubt that was fruitless for IMGTEC, NEC sold around 13+ million chips to sega (Dreamcast + Naomi 1 and II), would they have sold 13 million Neon 250's?.. maybe, maybe not.
On top of that they need a Via, Sony, or other big boy to pick up the ball and score a touchdown. What they need is for someone with oodles and oodles of resources who WANTS to dominate the graphics market ro come in and partner with them
Now I do agree with that 100%, if IT were partnerd with a company that wanted to challenge Nvidia and ATI in the PC graphics market they could do very well IMO.