nelg said:Can Intel and AMD clock so high due to better wafers or process tech. Intel seems to be able to produce >1GHz chips cost effectively. So what is it specifically about a 13nm GPU that prevents it from being clocked the same as a 13nm CPU?Vysez said:Maybe I don't understand your question, but I think ERP already answered that:nelg said:Then why would it not be better to have a R300 @ 2GHz instead of a R420@520MHz?
ERP said:This ones relatively esay to answer....
It's cheaper to go wider than it is to increase clock. And as you mentioned graphics is so embarassingly parallel that it basically amounts to the same performance gain.
Complexity, the fact that all transisters are not equal, and the layout of the chip. Are those valid reasons or am I mistaken. Why isn't a toyota corolla as fast as a viper?