So, do we know anything about RV670 yet?

[_xxx_]

I stopped reading PR-crap from both companies long time ago.

 

[ShaidarHaran]

I said "the new 8800 GTS" (no, i'm not talking about the 112sp leftovers from the G80 core)
We already know how much the 8800 GT will cost ($199 for the 256MB version and $249 for the 512MB one).

Notice how I said AMD? I was talking about the 3870 price

 

[Shtal]

As of now - judging RV670 on performance side, it is just overclock R600 on 55nm tech; As far I could tell right now.

 

[vertex_shader]

US$299 to 349, probably.
Much like the "new" 8800 GTS.

XT not have 299-349$ performance, new GTS eat the HD3870 for dinner

 

[vertex_shader]

Some rumor flooding around NDA expire on november 6.

 

[AnarchX]

Some rumor flooding around NDA expire on november 6.

Interesting, so you not have to wait so long to come to the final decision: 8800GT...

 

[Shtal]

Anyone read this yet ?
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3735&Itemid=34

Last line of key features of HD3000 series

-Game physics processing capability

I've faith on ATI once again.

UT3 gogo.

Here is overclocked HD 2900XT @ 825MHz GPU which gives basic Idea how RV670 will perform @ 825MHz as well.

http://techreport.com/articles.x/12956/10

 

[vertex_shader]

Interesting, so you not have to wait so long to come to the final decision: 8800GT...

(sarcasm on) Card without dx10.1 support and VC-1 HW decode are useless (sarcasm off)

 

[Pressure]

Here is overclocked HD 2900XT @ 825MHz GPU which gives basic Idea how RV670 will perform @ 825MHz as well.

http://techreport.com/articles.x/12956/10

The problem being that apparently the RV670 has improved Anisotropic Filtering as well as Anti-aliasing performance compared to the R600.

 

[no-X]

The problem being that apparently the RV670 has improved Anisotropic Filtering as well as Anti-aliasing performance compared to the R600.

So why ATi said, that RV670 and R600 are performing equally?

 

[Shtal]

I just came across article that is talking about:

At the same time the company claims that it managed to improve antialiasing performance and at the same time that it managed to reduce the memory interface bandwidth. The anisotropic texture filtering quality is also improved and at the same time ATI managed to reduce the transistor count.
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3570&Itemid=1

 

[fellix]

More spec's galore on RV670.

Anyone on the Gather4 fetch feature?

 

[Jawed]

Anyone on the Gather4 fetch feature?

The D3D10.1 name for Fetch4?

Jawed

 

[Shtal]

More spec's galore on RV670.

Anyone on the Gather4 fetch feature?

GeForce 8800 GT 512MB version, including wafer process, DirectX 10.1, Model 4.1, UVD imaging processor technology

Link


Looks like RV670 and G92 both support DX10.1 (SM4.1)

 

[ShaidarHaran]

More spec's galore on RV670.

Anyone on the Gather4 fetch feature?

666million trannies?

Damn it!

 

[fellix]

The Devil's tech!

 

[ShaidarHaran]

DP is confirmed if those slides are real.
Same texture fetch rate though, which is a bit disappointing.
I just hope AA performance is fixed.

 

[{Sniping}Waste]

Link


Looks like RV670 and G92 both support DX10.1 (SM4.1)

All I have seen for the G92 is its only DX10.0 with SM4.0.

One thing that strikes the SM4.1 is the UVD support and Nvidia don't do UVD (UVD is a AMD/ATI thing) but have PureVideo.

 

[Geeforcer]

All I have seen for the G92 is its only DX10.0 with SM4.0.

One thing that strikes the SM4.1 is the UVD support and Nvidia don't do UVD (UVD is a AMD/ATI thing) but have PureVideo.

Call me stupid but UVD has what do do with SM4.1, exactly?

 

[Mintmaster]

DP is confirmed if those slides are real.

Did I miss something? Where does it say that?

I assume 128-bit precision refers to 4xFP32-bit just as it always has. DP is FP64.