one said:The example of NDS seems to suggest otherwise. Or, if they launch last with an underwhelming spec (GC) what will happen?
And yet that underwhelming GC turned out the best looking game this gen (RE4).
I really think, in general, the B3D forums has too much of an emphasis on the technology over what developers are DOING with that technology. All three consoles are able to turn out some sick graphics.
This next gen there is only about 6 months between the Xbox 360 launch and the Japanese PS3 launch. Since it appears the R500 has a separate chip for the eDRAM and looks to be produced on the 90nm process it does not seem likely that the PS3 GPU will have a huge advantage. I think it will be a little more powerful (and the CELL behind it will help interactivity AND animation a lot), but I think at the GPU level it will be more tit for tat.
I am not convinced ANY of the consoles will pull away or underwhealm. I think Nintendo, Sony, and MS will all be in the same ballpark. What will be important is how developers use that power. With programmable shaders instead of fixed function GPUs I think good developers will overwhelm while low end ones will make us wonder why the game was not done this gen.
MechanizedDeath said:As down as I may be on them, there's nothing to say Nintendo couldn't finally get their stuff together and relegate MS to a distant 3rd. Afterall, MS won't have any hw advantage anymore
I think that Sony fans really overplay the Xbox power angle. Like all hype it may have sold some of the initial units, but after that it was all the games. As much as most of you might like to believe, many casual gamers actually bought the Xbox because they liked the games. Look at the games MS put out the last 6 months: Halo 2, Forza, Jade Empire. All exclusives to the Xbox in the console sector. People are not buying Xboxes for specs, they are buying them for the games.
While the Xbox power had an influence on sales, it had no more influence than the hype Sony created for the PS2. Remember, the PS2 CPU did like 6GFLOPs (2x the Xbox) and had a fill rate and VPU memory bandwidth that dwarfed the Xbox. A lot of people bought the PS2 at launch because of the promise of good games (since the launch was weak imo) and the powerer. Yet that did not produce 80M sales. A strong steady stream of AAA titles did that.
I already posted that I think the PS3 will be the market leader... but I see MS doing a lot of moves to pull the PC and Xbox closer, they have established themselves, and worked hard to make their platform developer friendly. Weaker console or not I have not heard anything that makes me think they will do worse. MS has a tendancy to learn and do better each revision at a time. Xbox is following classic MS strategy.
As long as that strategy keeps the field competitive and offers new ways for some developers to make better games I am all for that. I dread the days of Nintendos monopoly. The fact a company disatisified with Nintendo can go to Sony or MS, or vice versa, and make a name for themselves is great. The more great companies we have making money means we all benefit.
It also keeps the forums active