Rumor: Xbox 360 CES Announcements Leaked

Do replacements for broken units add to the count?
Do refurbed units add to the count again when they ship back out?
I wonder this issue too ...

I guess ; for instance ~ 10 mil Xbox360s went to retailers ... ~ 400K units broken ... Broken Xbox360s went back to MS ... And MS fixed and shipped that 400K again to retailers and reached 10.4 mil units ... Double count at this example ... Is this the way how MS calculates shipments ?..
 
The real question is what this means going forward. IIRC, they've "hit" their goals of 5 million by July 2006, only to ship ~900k the next quarter due to obvious channel stuff. While we see another drying up of shipments next quarter?
 
I wonder this issue too ...

I guess ; for instance ~ 10 mil Xbox360s went to retailers ... ~ 400K units broken ... Broken Xbox360s went back to MS ... And MS fixed and shipped that 400K again to retailers and reached 10.4 mil units ... Double count at this example ... Is this the way how MS calculates shipments ?..

A console is only sold once, I highly doubt MS could report replacement units as sales. Funny what people will try to believe sometimes...
 
Well then you didn't pay close enough attention in the lead-up to the PS3 launch though. No one's talking about (or cares) what the 360 fanbase was saying up to launch...

I paid attention. I just dont agree....which is fine. If I recall correctly, MS always stood on the the position that if the market and the users clamored for a specific feature, technology, or accessory they would make it available when the time was right. I think that posture covers all bases without overcommitting you to any particlaur feature (dual HDMI), price point ($5-600), or timeline ( launch fall 2005/spring 2006/ fall 2006/ march 2007) for example.

Basically X360 is a platform which is extensible, but is really PRICED for next generation gaming... makes sense to me and isn't disingenuous or insidious... It just forces the other guy to make good on promises and highlights those promises just so that no one can swept them under the rug and forget them... *shrug*

As far as the fanbase comment is concerned I was responding to patsu who specifically stated that MS and its "fanbase" was spinning the irrelevance of non-gaming features... Which they/we aren't. "Live" like functionality of all things is associated with MS... VOD is an extension of the PC world so no problems there. Edit: See Scooby's post here he summarizes a bit better here... http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showpost.php?p=904111&postcount=39

Essentially since MS only hung its hat on gaming, all it has to produce is great games. But since Sony promises so much more to their consumers in a comparative, checklist-we-are-better-than-them fashion, the onus is purely on Sony to not to falter in any of those arenas that SONY themselves highlighted. The stumbling block is not the promises but rather Sony's [in]ability to execute at a high level worldwide.
 
If there's an MS official on record somewhere clearing that up, I'd appreciate a link.

I don't think you'd ever find an exec in any company Nintendo, Sony, MS, Panasonic, Sega anybody... flirting with those numbers or how they're handled.

It really is a non issue IMO, we could nitpick the same concerns over the 100 million Ps2's sold but why bother other than to try and diminish their meaning?
 
MS wants the 360 to be a digital media hub every bit as much as Sony wants the PS3 to be, make no mistake.

I would amend this to say that MS wants the 360 to be a digital media gateway. They would prefer that a Vista PC is used as the hub.
 
I would amend this to say that MS wants the 360 to be a digital media gateway. They would prefer that a Vista PC is used as the hub.

Um... 360 interacts just fine with Windows 2000 or XP actually. :D


and I'm thankful for that interaction seeing as my PC is next to my 360 and offers me lots of options.
 
Maybe you scould provide some quotes, as I have no idea what you're talking about. They criticised Bluray but that's all, Sony hasn't even put forward a comprehensive overview of what they are planning on doing with regards to digital distribution, so I don't see how MS could be criticizing Sony for something they haven't even defined.

MS has been leading the charge since day 1, with the inclusion of music video's and trailers, streaming audo from PC, supports for MP3's players like IPOD, PVR and video streaming support with windows MC all on day 1, followed by announcements of DirectTV support, followed by announcements of downloadable TV shows, and now the announcement of IPTV.

AFAIK, Sony has shown little more than a few powerpoint slides.

Scooby I really was not trying to turn this into a side topic... so I'm not going to. And I agree with you that MS has been on the leading edge on all of these things. But whether Sony remains in powerpoint-land or not, we all know this is their end goal... and it's also the reason MS got into the gaming biz in the first place - to head Sony off at the pass.

Putting out great games is just a means to an ends in this, not 'console' war, but 'media' war.

@Blakjedi: Sure I don't disagree.

I would amend this to say that MS wants the 360 to be a digital media gateway. They would prefer that a Vista PC is used as the hub.

Well, I think they're playing both sides to the fullest right now. I agree that Vista would be (and will be) an area where they spend the majority of their 'media hub' efforts, but with IPTV, movie and music downloads, and the gaming and optical playback all there as resident (or through add-on) capabilities of the 360... that's all you need. That's a media hub of sorts right there.
 
perhaps you need to read the original post? discussing what constitutes sold/shipped is NOT on topic. specifically when we know exactly what MS means by 'Sold" after it's been debated a million times and despite MS clarifying this themselves.

Well, who knows, maybe MS have changed the way that they define shipped. Also, I think they measure shipped differently in Europe and Japan (and wherever else MS is selling).
 
Huge news! I remember hearing something about this before MS launched and will truly be looking forward to this as an option (especially if priced right) as I don't have cable :)shock: -I know).

Regarding the marketing efforts of either Sony or MS, I honestly feel bad for Sony's marketing dept as most of the argument against ps3 is price related. There's only so much they can do when competing against a system that is priced lower and offers similar game experiences. If Xbox360 was in the same price bracket Sony would still have a hard time matching the sales of ps2 but it would be a much easier job for their marketing dept. As far as MS's marketing dept goes: I wouldn't say they've done anything great so far as up till now the system has sold itself by either their own advantages or Sony's screw ups.
 
Basically X360 is a platform which is extensible, but is really PRICED for next generation gaming... makes sense to me and isn't disingenuous or insidious... It just forces the other guy to make good on promises and highlights those promises just so that no one can swept them under the rug and forget them... *shrug*
I think thats the wrong perspective. XBOX 360 isn't the "platform" for many of the services that have been added since lauch, it is currently just the physical vehicle at this point in time. "LIVE!" is the platform, and LIVE is what they will be using ongoing - be that through future iterations of XBOX, PC's or even potentially, I can see should the services be sucessful enough, pure net enabled set-top devices - with Music, downloadable movies, internet based TV services and pure browsing there it may end up as a point of being able to offer enough without having to sell the "console" in order for the vehicle to be in the living room.

MS were making the statements about reaching god knows how many people initially, and realisically its LIVE that is going to be doing that in the future, the gaming console is there just as the initial delivery mechanism for live.
 
It'll be an interesting one - Apple have a standing start here, whereas MS will have 10M headstart with some considerable proportion already connected. If iTunes/iTV is $299 then I'd like to know what value it has over 360 and LIVE!.
 
Um... 360 interacts just fine with Windows 2000 or XP actually. :D


and I'm thankful for that interaction seeing as my PC is next to my 360 and offers me lots of options.

Sure, but that doesn't stop MS from wanting you to buy Vista. ;)
 
I predict LIVE will be blown away by iTunes + ITV when Apple launches it on Jan 8th.

This seems too outlandish to be taken seriously.

Anyway ITV isn't exactly what is needed in this arena. ITV is meant to stream media from a PC. A pure set-top box hooked directly to the net is better imo.

And at $299, I bet they wont get a lot of initial takers. Credit inq for this point, but the 360 plays games too for the same price (or close, assuming future price drops).

But yeah, lets say Apple has some work to do to "blow away" a 10 million installed base, especially since mainstream hype for iTV so far is relatively nonexistent. Apple clearly feels very threatened by the Xbox platform though, also evidenced by rumors of Apple entering gaming. I'm sure Apple looks on Xbox with a bit of longing.
 
I eally hope that they will soon allow storing on either an extrenal USB HDD or on your PC, however in order for them not to loose sales maybe you would still have to have a "regular" xbox360 attached HDD or something for you to use the extrenal HDD or PC...

they already do, you can buy several different brands of transfer kits to transfer files from the 360 HDD to the PC HDD
 
I think you miss the points the "fanbase" has tried to make in relation to this argument.

blakjedi, in addition to what you highlighted, there were also negative posts that insist that any additional functions is superfluous. My point was they said this because PS3 has a higher list price compared to Xbox 360 at that time. I don't think I have missed the point. I merely highlighted the existence of those school of thoughts and gave a straightforward explanation.

As for MS's statements...

blakjedi said:
MS says the x360 is a games console firstand can play movies in in SD or HD, download games or act as a centerpiece for other media.

Sony hasnt created a cogent view of what its device is. Its a media hub, its a cheap bluray player, its a cheap linux computer and oh yeah have you seen the games?

Agree. If you read my past posts, this is the major complain I have about Sony too.

MS says upfront there will be one online service to serve all, both users and devs; and for the high end service, it costs money - a single flat rate once per year.

Sony says our service is free ( as in beer) but devs may reserve the right to charge you...

Since I own a PS3, I feel obliged to elaborate...

Sony has given a Playstation Network presentation to the industry (Entitlements and stuff). The consumers have not gotten the full picture yet. Today, consumers know Playstation Network online gaming is free and open.

Open in the sense that the devs can choose the best way to implement their game. e.g., Resistance:Fall of Men is server based and has wonderful online experiences. According to some on GAF, they find the experience more pleasant than P2P Live games (e.g, lag, waiting time). And yes, it's free... just like RR7.

As for devs reserving the right to charge you, I don't think it's a concern or even relevant at this point (The same way one does not need to worry about Xbox Live price hike). If it's not sustainable, they will raise it. If not, life goes on as usual. In the mean time, free is free. I am not sure what's confusing or negative about it.

We also know that PSN's currency is the actual dollar amount (No point system), so it's somewhat natural to interpret the cost of purchase. Finally we understand that it's still being improved. PSP <-> PS3 connectivity is something I personally look forward to.

MS says HiDefinition Video disk playback is an affordable option if you are inclined at this point in time. The premium is $200 for this option. Save $200 upfront until you want it.

Sony says HD Video Disk is a standard (requirement) of next generation gameplay. The premium currently is a $100 (over any level X360) for that requirement.

Agree. Is there any question here ? I actually like the game worlds I have seen so far. I have spent countless hours in Resistance, and can appreciate the variety in the game world. However, you don't see me posting everywhere to highlight this. I'm just not that kind of person until someone asks.

I also take comfort that every PS3 owners will have the same drive as me. With the large install base, I can see how content owners will want to sell to the fast growing user base.

MS says our online service is mature and is increasing in breadth and quality every day.

Sony says Our online service is nascent but we plan on matching Xbox's service sooner than later.

Sony says Playstation is a brand. There is no Online Playstation vs Offline Playstation. They see Online as one of the channels, the same way Blu-ray is a channel. Both are built into PS3 today.

The free PSN brought me to the online gaming world. Otherwise, I wouldn't have bothered. Also the downloadable games seem cheaper than LIVE. More PS1 classics (for PSP and PS3) will be available soon.

Meanwhile, Blu-ray is also growing. I don't see why one has to grow and the other has to shrink. They are separate markets for some years to come.

MS says if you want to compute use the pc you probably already have - there is synergy between our console and the PC.

Sony says you can get Linux and use it for our system if you are so inclined or hate MS. Only geeks hate MS, consumers are frustrated by computers in general...

I think you just put words in Sony's mouth. They say PS3 is also a computer. But they market it as a game console (See the Play B3yond website for details).

I have been using PS3 as a computer for more than a month. How is that a negative thing for the consumer (even if Sony hasn't talked very much about it) ? In fact Sony mentioned PS3 is an Open Platform. We may see other OSes too.

Based on some early experiences, there are still rough edges in the environment. But doing the usual web browsing, email reading and typing personal documents is no problem. I am still reading up on Cell programming, and am surprised to see very positive research/experience papers from National Laboratories in US. I look forward to better Cell exploits in the future.

I dont see the spin you talk about and there are fairly compelling arguments in both camps.

What spin ? Just google for those posts around the period when PS3 price was first announced. As for "fairly compelling arguments"... the way you said it, PS3 doesn't sound compelling to me at all. Do you own a PS3 to understand and appreciate what it is about ? (since you also admit that Sony has not created a cogent view about it).

For the record, I am also loading my family photos to PS3 to try out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDypErvJrD0&eurl=

I travel overseas often and love to bring my latest family photos and videos on my PSP with me. So I'm hoping that with the upcoming PSP <-> PS3 connectivity, I will be able to access all the media remotely. In fact, I have to hand-pick and convert these media to the PSP today when I visit my parents or the in-laws (They are always eager to see how my little boy is doing).

Since Sony is pretty quiet on all front, I'm quite pissed that I have to learn PS3 by discovering it bit by bit (Like game sharing, which has its own thread somewhere else).

EDIT: Wait a minute... this is an Xbox 360 CES thread. Mods, I'm sorry for derailing this thread. If you will, please move my post to the PS3 impression thread. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I had zero excitement watching WWDC when movies and itv were announced (actually it was when the resolutions were announced). Personally, Apple is a third class citizen when it comes to a media center experience, behind ElGato and Windows Media Center. I've not bought a single movie from iTunes, I have however, downloaded two HD movies from Live. As it stands now, Live is only missing one network that I watch, Sci-Fi Channel.

The resolution will obviously be bumped, if MS doesn't think so, they're being suckered by Apple into a false sense of security.

MS is a third class citizen when it comes to selling media tho. Apple outsells them easily, as well as every MS device. Apple's iPod *USB charger* outsold the Zune. The problem with MS's idealogy is it revolves around the PC and XB. The whole point of the ITV is to have a slick tiny playback device that can be placed in multiple rooms, rather than sticking a huge PC or XB360 on each TV.

Frankly, TV is about the only thing I'll download over any of these services. I will not pay for HD downloads that have inferior bitrates, no HDDVD/BluRay menus, extras, multiple audio tracks, etc. Which is why I still won't buy movies from iTunes, even if they sell downloadable 1080p h.264 AVC versions. Unless they sell them for $4 or something, if I'm gonna pay $9.99 or $14, I'd just as well buy the optical media. Wake me up when LIVE sells a 30gb downloadable with full HD-DVD extras.

But for watching missed episodes of Heroes or BSG? Yeah, it's nice, but only if I never Tivo'ed em.

PS: I feel the same way about Leopard...i'm hoping it can wow me because so far it hasn't. Leopard Server, however, I am very excited about.

Please, the only thing Vista has going for it is DX10/games. It took MS what, 6 YEARS to get Longhorn out, meanwhile, most of Vista's features, I've been using for a long time under OS X already. Leopard already has one feature that Vista will never come close to matching and singlehandedly sells the OS to me: ZFS. The other: it's Unix. I've been running Vista since beta1 under Parallels all the way up to RTM, for 6 years of effort, it sucks ass. Aero sucks as a UI. And it still doesn't come with anything that competes with iLife.

Vista for me is a gaming container OS that I boot into on my Mac Pro when DX10 games like Crysis arrive.
 
Back
Top